dramatispersonae | [ * ] Coral

Skip to Main Content

[ * ] Coral

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.e.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

You can choose to be an attacker, be a martyr or be an adviser. It is hardest to win as an adviser. But to be an attacker you must be callous and to be a martyr you must have a taste for pain.

Also, please name two teams you wish to know more about.

Edited 2012-12-31 22:55 (UTC)

. . .

[immediately reaches for his hand]

[taking .-.]

[squeezes it tightly]

Do you care about winning? Lizard and I want to be advisers.

Re: discussion

pitching - 2012-12-31 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2012-12-31 23:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2012-12-31 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2012-12-31 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2012-12-31 23:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

dramatispersonae - 2012-12-31 23:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

[. . . damn it]

How man of you guys actually care about winning this thing?

Let's go for adviser.

I don't care about winning, but just because it's the hardest thing doesn't mean we won't make it.

Frankly, I don't give a shit about winning games like this, either. And I'm not about to push us to be unnecessarily callous, or to take on unnecessary pain.

Let's be advisers, then.

Edited 2012-12-31 23:20 (UTC)

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2012-12-31 23:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2012-12-31 23:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2012-12-31 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2012-12-31 23:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2012-12-31 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2012-12-31 23:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2012-12-31 23:59 (UTC) - Expand

We'll take the adviser role. And the teams we choose are Peridot and Turquoise.

Edited 2013-01-01 00:04 (UTC)

[ THREE CARDS APPEAR - on one side is an apple, on the other is text. ]

The first reads: "Reflect"
Rose wants To gain the absolute power necessary to accomplish all impossible feats, no matter what the cost

The second reads: "Nullify"
Sunshower wants to To pat all of the sad members on Turquoise whether they would like it or not.

The third reads: "Weaken"
Naoto doesn't want For everyone to not need him anymore and leave and abandon him

You will play all three cards simultaneously, but choose which order you want them to be used. Reflect turns a card back on whoever played it, nullify cancels a card's action and weaken will bring a card's action down a rank.

The other cards that teams may be playing are attack cards - a minor, medium or major injury to another team or martyr cards - a minor, medium or major injury to their own team. As adviser you can try and guess who might play what in which round and do the most 'good'.

[blinks as he reads their cards, silent for a loooong moment as it all sinks in]

[and then he just. l. . . laughs]

[???]

[his shoulders quiver with each chortle, and he shakes his head]

Ha! S'nothing, I swear.

[bright smile]

We just picked a good role, that's all.

Edited 2013-01-01 00:20 (UTC)

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 00:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 00:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

I guess we know what it meant now.

[seems extremely pleased]

I should've known, honestly. Let's just ignore it. It's none of our business, anyway.

Edited 2013-01-01 00:22 (UTC)

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 00:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 00:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 00:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 01:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

blackjacked - 2013-01-01 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 01:11 (UTC) - Expand

It definitely could have been worse.

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 00:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 01:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

devilishfiend - 2013-01-01 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

pitching - 2013-01-01 02:16 (UTC) - Expand

Please reply with what order you are playing the cards in and on which teams.

[ ie - 1: nullify peridot's card
2: weaken ruby's card
3: reflect emerald's card ]

1: Reflect Carnelian's card
2: Weaken Jasper's card
3: Nullify Sapphire's card

Congratulations on choosing well.

Proceed to endgame.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only