[ * ] Coral

[dramatispersonae]

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.e.

Comments

Re: discussion

[devilishfiend]

In that case, we should definitely use nullify on a martyr team, and weaken on an attacker.

If we use reflect on a team we think chose advisor, then there wouldn't be any damage to begin with, right?

Re: discussion

[blackjacked]

Right. But then we'd be nullifying whatever good they might do. So I think we should play reflect on a team that's likely to have either weaken or nullify played on 'em by another adviser team.

[idly toys with the cards in his hand as he thinks]

Carnelian is known to play hard, so let's play reflect on them, assuming another team will either weaken or nullify their attack. Jasper can get our weaken card. . .

And either the knights or Sapphire can get nullify.

Re: discussion

[devilishfiend]

If it's fine with you, I'd like to play nullify on Sapphire, then.

Re: discussion

[blackjacked]

[wide grin]

Heh, yeah. I was leaning more towards Sapphire myself.

Any particular order we should play them in?

Re: discussion

[devilishfiend]

It's hard to say. It's likely our first card will effect the team we pick's first card, the second's second and the third's second. So we should try to guess our teams orders as well...

Re: discussion

[blackjacked]

[ha. . .]

I don't think we can predict that well. If we guessed their roles correctly, we'd negate some damage, no matter what round they played their heavier cards in.

Carnelian first, Jasper second, and Sapphire third?

Re: discussion

[devilishfiend]

Sounds good to me.

Re: discussion

[blackjacked]

[pulls up a bright, genuine smile and gives him a thumbs up]

Re: discussion

[devilishfiend]

[ RETURNING THAT THUMBS UP!! ]