؟ (
dramatispersonae) wrote2012-12-31 05:31 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[ * ] Coral
[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.
A woman's voice - can be heard now ]
Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.e.
A woman's voice - can be heard now ]
Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.e.
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
I should've known, honestly. Let's just ignore it. It's none of our business, anyway.
Re: discussion
We can focus on the game now. So, what teams, and what card?
Re: discussion
[folds his arms and lets out a thoughtful hum]
The reflect card, on the other hand, poses a different problem.
Re: discussion
If we use reflect on a team we think chose advisor, then there wouldn't be any damage to begin with, right?
Re: discussion
[idly toys with the cards in his hand as he thinks]
Carnelian is known to play hard, so let's play reflect on them, assuming another team will either weaken or nullify their attack. Jasper can get our weaken card. . .
And either the knights or Sapphire can get nullify.
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
Heh, yeah. I was leaning more towards Sapphire myself.
Any particular order we should play them in?
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
I don't think we can predict that well. If we guessed their roles correctly, we'd negate some damage, no matter what round they played their heavier cards in.
Carnelian first, Jasper second, and Sapphire third?
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
[BOXING YOUR EARS]
Re: discussion
—hey!
Re: discussion
You'll never know!
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
Re: discussion
Re: discussion