؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-12-31 05:31 pm

[ * ] Coral

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.e.

Re: discussion

[personal profile] devilishfiend 2012-12-31 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's go for adviser.

I don't care about winning, but just because it's the hardest thing doesn't mean we won't make it.
blackjacked: ([kid] not sure if good idea...)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Frankly, I don't give a shit about winning games like this, either. And I'm not about to push us to be unnecessarily callous, or to take on unnecessary pain.

Let's be advisers, then.
Edited 2012-12-31 23:20 (UTC)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] devilishfiend 2012-12-31 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
[ nodding ]

So long as Coral is safe, it's fine. No need for sacrifices for the time being.
blackjacked: ([kid] :O)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
[small, lopsided smile]

Right.

Now we just need to pick two teams.

Re: discussion

[personal profile] devilishfiend 2012-12-31 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, I wonder if we can pick Coral for one of those. It said to pick two teams we want to know more about.
blackjacked: (Amuuuusement)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[can't help but laugh lightly]

Are you saying you don't feel like you know us that well?

Re: discussion

[personal profile] devilishfiend 2012-12-31 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
That's right, that's right! I'm still a newbie, after all!
blackjacked: (Un deux trois...)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I think Dragonfly brings up a pretty good point. Let's ask how we're getting to know 'em first.

Re: discussion

[personal profile] devilishfiend 2012-12-31 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
It's better to be certain, that's true.
blackjacked: ([kid] :3c)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
[mock salute, and brb asking]
blackjacked: (I make a lot of grumpy faces)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
[And our answer. . .]

Tch. I dunno why I ever expect straightforward answers from these guys.

Re: discussion

[personal profile] devilishfiend 2012-12-31 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
[ silent for a moment ]

I don't think it's going to hurt anyone. Logically speaking, with the way the Persona put it, it's more likely we'll either find out what position a team has taken or something else about them.

If it's just what a team picked in this phase, there's no harm done to any team. But if it's finding out something about them, if it ends up being something bad or uncomfortable... picking Coral as one of the two teams minimizes the "damage" onto others.

On the other hand, if it really is finding out what position teams took, finding it out this round might be useful to protect ourselves. For example, if we used it on teams we know are dangerous... then we could know what to do in the next phase.
blackjacked: (Shiny on the street?)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
[lifts a hand, brushing it through his hair as he mulls this over]

. . . no, I don't think it's anything that'll do damage in and of itself. But with a vague answer like that one, I'm not sure I want to take my chances and potentially give us a harmful disadvantage.

[exhale]

Let's just pick two other teams. Peridot, and one other.

Re: discussion

[personal profile] devilishfiend 2012-12-31 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
...Turquoise, if that's fine with you.
blackjacked: (Un deux trois...)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] blackjacked 2012-12-31 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
[. . . nods]

Peridot and Turquoise. S'fine with me.