؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2014-02-04 07:04 pm

SAPPHIRE

[ The room you find yourself in is well-lit with, although its hard to tell exactly where the light source is. It also seems to be made up of the same walls that you might have seen around the Ring. Ones that move.

There's also a variety of crafting materials: paper, crayons, clay, wood, a carving knife, scissors and whatever else you might need to design a piece of art.

And on the floor, there's a piece of paper with words on it. Strange. ]
aristocritical: (don't let's start.)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-02-06 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
[Crouching to investigate the materials.]

We should make something in the shape of a strong, lovely, and useful plant, I dare say.
glorious: (intrigue)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] glorious 2014-02-06 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Do you have any particular plant in mind?
aristocritical: (pic#7287703)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-02-06 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
[Faltering a little.]

I suppose Apple would be the expert at that. But she isn't here.

Then perhaps simply a flower-shaped boat?
glorious: Van with his eyes closed, looking amused (chuckle)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] glorious 2014-02-06 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
[...]

A flower-shaped boat should be fine then. We could sail it to a destination of our own choosing.
aristocritical: (pic#7287686)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-02-06 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
[Giving him a Disapproving Look, but saying nothing on the matter of Apple for now.]

Yes, that sounds right for us!

[And she starts working with the clay and the wood...]
glorious: (frontier)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] glorious 2014-02-06 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
[...will ask about that later.]

It sounds as though we have a plan then. What words would you consider for a strength?
aristocritical: (perhaps I love you best.)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-02-06 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
Emotional, certainly. Perhaps longevity, as you have been here for quite some time?
glorious: (intrigue)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] glorious 2014-02-06 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
I can't argue with 'emotional'...Longevity only applies to half of us here, but it does seem more suitable than some of the other options.
aristocritical: (pic#7229109)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-02-06 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps "logical," as who would expect both "logical" and "emotional" to be strengths? Yet they are, as we can be both passionate and sensible.
glorious: A field of white flowers in bloom (pride)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] glorious 2014-02-06 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
[...chuckles]

That is an excellent way of putting it. We all attempt to approach things in a logical manner, but we are still very passionate about it.
aristocritical: (don't let's start.)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-02-06 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
[Placing some paper on the flower-boat and drawing on it in blue crayon.]

Then we have logical, emotional, and longevity for strengths...what about weaknesses?
glorious: (interest)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] glorious 2014-02-06 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
That's more difficult...

[a pause]

I'd say 'spiritual' for myself though I can't say if it applies to everyone on the team.
aristocritical: (pic#7233887)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-02-06 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
We could say that we're far too spirited for the Personae to handle.
glorious: (conversation)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] glorious 2014-02-06 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
[...LAUGHS]

That's a far better way of putting it.