[*] knights

[dramatispersonae]

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Comments

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

I don't want to reflect an attacker's card.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

Then we have more chances of reflecting an adviser than guessing a martyr.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

I don't want to reflect an attacker, but I would rather reflect an attacker than an adviser. Accidentally reflecting a 'nullify' wouldn't be good for anyone.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

Wouldn't that just cancel out whatever that adviser team was doing?

My main thing is you have to have a sure guess for a martyr.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

If we're more sure of who the attackers are, that's fine. And most of us want to do it on an attacker, right? I'll go with it even if I don't like it.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

If you want to go safe with reflect, we can just pick a team we're sure would be an adviser. It shouldn't involve any actual damage since we're just reflecting whatever they're doing.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

Advisers have the potential to stop another team from being injured. I don't want to hinder them.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

It's either that or reflect an attacker, Mikage-san. We have to decide whether we want to stop an attack or cancel a neutral action.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

I said I'll go with reflecting an attacker.