[*] knights

[dramatispersonae]

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Comments

stance

[dramatispersonae]

(frozen comment) choices:

[dramatispersonae]

You can choose to be an attacker, be a martyr or be an adviser. It is hardest to win as an adviser. But to be an attacker you must be callous and to be a martyr you must have a taste for pain.

Also, please name two teams you wish to know more about.

discussion

[dramatispersonae]

final answer

[dramatispersonae]

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

[...narrows his eyes some in distaste]

This kind of thing, is it.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

Off to a good start, huh.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

Ugh… Not attacker.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

Exceptionally so.

If the none of us were particularly attached to the idea of winning, then I would suggest we all take advisor role. However, I would not begrudge anyone a desire to win their memories -- furthermore, I am somewhat worried that we may later regret have no one armed or to take damage, in a set up like this.

I can quite easily see how this could become a game of pitting the teams against one another.

Re: discussion

[snakeeyed]

[huh, well]

There are other words for people with a taste for pain, and I hope no one's going to admit to that kind of fetish publicly.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

Adviser sounds the most useful, easy to win or not.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

Let's do advisor.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

I'm fine with advisor. I don't think many of us are going to be all that invested in trying to win, not with this kind of game.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

Now, surely there'd be no reason to judge your fellow knights so, no matter their preferences.

[teasing]

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

[nods]

I've little desire to hurt others for such a weak goal as winning a single game, and likely cannot risk volunteering as Martyr.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

Yeah… We gotta protect you, too.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

[tips his head at the new tiny knight]

Perhaps not, but as she is brand new... I would not hold it against any who would wish to know more of themselves, is all.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

My thanks, and apologies as always for that burden.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

If it means attackin' other people, I would.

Re: discussion

[snakeeyed]

[why do I sense I'm being sassed? I feel I'm being sassed]

Ha! I'm not judging unless they're inclined to to include me. That sort of thing would surely kill me.

[sounds... almost proud of that fact]

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

It's not like you chose it or nothin'. I don't really wanna get hurt, either, it's just better protectin' teams most of the time…

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

Yes, of course.

I am grateful all the same.

Re: discussion

[snakeeyed]

It won't be an issue with me this time, at least. I'm best suited for the role of adviser.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

Eheh, didn't think you were gonna choose attackin'. You're nice.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

[sympathetic to that, but]

I simply don't feel that I'm in position here to try and steer the course of anyone else's life or morality.

But-- if no one wishes to be attacker, then it is a moot issue.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

If they're draggin' mine along with 'em, I'm gonna steer 'em good.