[*] knights

[dramatispersonae]

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Comments

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

Off to a good start, huh.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

Exceptionally so.

If the none of us were particularly attached to the idea of winning, then I would suggest we all take advisor role. However, I would not begrudge anyone a desire to win their memories -- furthermore, I am somewhat worried that we may later regret have no one armed or to take damage, in a set up like this.

I can quite easily see how this could become a game of pitting the teams against one another.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

Let's do advisor.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

[nods]

I've little desire to hurt others for such a weak goal as winning a single game, and likely cannot risk volunteering as Martyr.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

Yeah… We gotta protect you, too.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

My thanks, and apologies as always for that burden.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

It's not like you chose it or nothin'. I don't really wanna get hurt, either, it's just better protectin' teams most of the time…

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

Yes, of course.

I am grateful all the same.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

I'm fine with advisor. I don't think many of us are going to be all that invested in trying to win, not with this kind of game.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

[tips his head at the new tiny knight]

Perhaps not, but as she is brand new... I would not hold it against any who would wish to know more of themselves, is all.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

If it means attackin' other people, I would.

Re: discussion

[snakeeyed]

It won't be an issue with me this time, at least. I'm best suited for the role of adviser.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

Eheh, didn't think you were gonna choose attackin'. You're nice.

Re: discussion

[snakeeyed]

It might be a little early to say that much, but from what I hear there will be other opportunities to win memories within a day or two, and I have no desire to see anyone hurt when there's no strong reason for it.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

[sympathetic to that, but]

I simply don't feel that I'm in position here to try and steer the course of anyone else's life or morality.

But-- if no one wishes to be attacker, then it is a moot issue.

Re: discussion

[yourmama]

If they're draggin' mine along with 'em, I'm gonna steer 'em good.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

Fair enough, that.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

We should choose teams that are more random in their decisions. So we have a better idea of what's going on.

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

Got some teams in mind?

Re: discussion

[hunting]

Carnelian?

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

That's a good one. Depending on who's there you'll get some pretty different answers.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

Right. I'm only really familiar with Summer and Alena.

What team would you choose?

Re: discussion

[floorcandy]

I would try to pick ourselves in case it's telling personal things instead of giving us their choice.

Re: discussion

[headcannon]

Ling is present, for Carnelian. He dislikes the Personae upon principle and he is-- protective, in that he will preference Carnelian and their interests above all others.

Least, so he has said to me. I've no reason to doubt him, from our other interactions, either.

Re: discussion

[hunting]

Most of Carnelian is extremely protective of Carnelian. And Ruby and Tiger's Eye.