؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-12-31 05:48 pm

[*] Iolite

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.
emocalypsed: (pic#4621849)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] emocalypsed 2013-01-01 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe...

Major to Ruby? Because at least they probably know that and it's probably better to give them Shade's thing rather than...some other team? And... Um.

Something to Peridot? And... Amethyst? I don't know anyone on those teams.
shipwithwings: laying down and peering at someone. [conversing/attentive/neutral] (Love of Life)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] shipwithwings 2013-01-01 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
I do not believe that the fact about Shade affects the quality of the attack. We said we would like to know about them, and so we were told, but the attack will be physical damage.
emocalypsed: (pic#4621833)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] emocalypsed 2013-01-01 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
Oh! Then... Then I don't think... Not Ruby.
shipwithwings: Laurence hugging Temeraire's face (Our Private World)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] shipwithwings 2013-01-01 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
I do not like to hurt Amethyst because it was Perscitia's team, but there is only one person there that she knew. I have no duty to defend the newer ones, so I am alright with attacking them and Peridot.
emocalypsed: (10)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] emocalypsed 2013-01-01 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
What about the last one?
shipwithwings: looking to the left with a question mark over his head [puzzled/confused/curious] (Coronation Street)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] shipwithwings 2013-01-01 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
[...pauses]

Actually, I would not like to attack Peridot. They have a child who is only newly arrived.
emocalypsed: (pic#4621836)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] emocalypsed 2013-01-01 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
...Oh. Okay. Then, um...
shipwithwings: laying down and peering at someone. [conversing/attentive/neutral] (Love of Life)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] shipwithwings 2013-01-01 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
I will accept Emerald, Coral, Carnelian, Sapphire, or the knights.
emocalypsed: (pic#4621563)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] emocalypsed 2013-01-01 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
[nod]

That's fine.
shipwithwings: swimming with neck outstretched, facing away (Santa Barbara)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] shipwithwings 2013-01-01 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Coral gave us a gift in the last game. It was a random choice, but it would be wrong to return them a gift of pain, so we could not do them, though I know them.

I do not know anyone on Emerald, and the knights will be expecting some teams to strike out at them; they have had that role before and none of the knights I am fond of are playing. I would give to the knights the greatest attack.
emocalypsed: (pic#4621550)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] emocalypsed 2013-01-01 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
That makes sense. I... Hm.

I only know one person on Emerald, Carnelian, and Sapphire, and I don't know if any of them are playing.
shipwithwings: laying down and peering at someone. [conversing/attentive/neutral] (Love of Life)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] shipwithwings 2013-01-01 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps then a strong attack to the knights, a medium attack to Amethyst, and a small attack to Carnelian?
emocalypsed: (pic#4621830)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] emocalypsed 2013-01-01 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
That sounds good.