dramatispersonae | [*] Iolite

[*] Iolite

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

You can choose to be an attacker, be a martyr or be an adviser. It is hardest to win as an adviser. But to be an attacker you must be callous and to be a martyr you must have a taste for pain.

Also, please name two teams you wish to know more about.

Edited 2012-12-31 23:00 (UTC)

There will be no playing as martyr, that is for certain.

So... Attacker or adviser? But I don't think I'd know enough to be an adviser.

As an attacker, we may be expected to hurt ourselves or other teams. Is that all right with you?

At least it'd be something we know how to do. If we choose to advise... It might be up to you, Obsidian.

I would have us be attackers. It is, as you say, something we both know how to do and I would not not want to make you reliant on my decisions if it can be helped.

I trust your decisions. But yeah, that's fine.

[closes a wing around Kamui, tucking him against his side]

As to the second part, is there a team you would like to know about, Reaper?

Um... Ruby?

[nods]

I will choose Jasper for the other one.

All right.

[leans against]

Is there someone you want to know more about on Jasper?

No. There is not much the Persona could tell me about my friend on Jasper that I do not already know; I do not want to collect my friends' secrets without their agreement.

I don't think I know anyone on Jasper very well.

He is the only one I know well, and I do not care enough for the others to care if I learn their secrets.

We will be attackers. We would like to more about Ruby and Jasper.

Edited 2012-12-31 23:50 (UTC)

[pets]

All right.

[ THREE CARDS APPEAR - on one side is an ax, on the other is text. ]

The first reads: "inflect minor injury"
Saya loves Jasper.

The second reads: "inflict medium injury"
Tavros wants least To go back home.

The third reads: "inflict major injury"
Shade wants To get back together with Itempas.

You will play all three cards simultaneously, but choose which order you want them to be used. Reflect turns a card back on whoever played it, nullify cancels a card's action and weaken will bring a card's action down a rank.

The other cards that teams may be playing are martyr cards - a minor, medium or major injury to their own team or adviser cards - reflect a card back to the player, nullify a card's effect and weaken a card's effect. As attacker please choose a team to attack with each of your cards.

Please reply with what order you are playing the cards in and on which teams.

[ ie - 1: major attack on sapphire
2: minor attack on emerald
3: medium attack on coral ]

...Oh...

So it is like this.

This is hard.

Maybe...

Major to Ruby? Because at least they probably know that and it's probably better to give them Shade's thing rather than...some other team? And... Um.

Something to Peridot? And... Amethyst? I don't know anyone on those teams.

I do not believe that the fact about Shade affects the quality of the attack. We said we would like to know about them, and so we were told, but the attack will be physical damage.

Oh! Then... Then I don't think... Not Ruby.

I do not like to hurt Amethyst because it was Perscitia's team, but there is only one person there that she knew. I have no duty to defend the newer ones, so I am alright with attacking them and Peridot.

What about the last one?

[...pauses]

Actually, I would not like to attack Peridot. They have a child who is only newly arrived.

...Oh. Okay. Then, um...

I will accept Emerald, Coral, Carnelian, Sapphire, or the knights.

[nod]

That's fine.

Coral gave us a gift in the last game. It was a random choice, but it would be wrong to return them a gift of pain, so we could not do them, though I know them.

I do not know anyone on Emerald, and the knights will be expecting some teams to strike out at them; they have had that role before and none of the knights I am fond of are playing. I would give to the knights the greatest attack.

That makes sense. I... Hm.

I only know one person on Emerald, Carnelian, and Sapphire, and I don't know if any of them are playing.

Perhaps then a strong attack to the knights, a medium attack to Amethyst, and a small attack to Carnelian?

That sounds good.

1: minor attack on Carnelian
2: strong attack on the knights
3: medium attack on Amethyst

Congratulations on choosing well.

Proceed to endgame.

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

[*] Iolite

stance

(frozen comment) choice:

discussion

final answer

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

CARDS

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: final answer

Re: discussion

Re: CARDS

Re: CARDS

discussion

final answer

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: final answer

no subject