؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-12-31 05:42 pm

[*] Amethyst

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.
vitalsarecritical: (I disapprove greatly)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
[. . . frowns at the text]

So that is what you meant by 'get to know a team' better.
2xcanoodlingkind: (12)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Do you know who these people are, Miss Pepper?
vitalsarecritical: (nurse angie to headquarters)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
I'm familiar with Apple of Sapphire and Wave of Turquoise, but I haven't met Shion.
2xcanoodlingkind: (6)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
So what do you think we ought to do? We don't even know what teams might attacking?
vitalsarecritical: (but think of the patients)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose we have to do our best to predict. I'm afraid I don't know which teams are more likely to attack, advise, or martyr themselves. . . so I don't think I'm very useful there.
2xcanoodlingkind: (pic#4852676)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
Hmph! It seems we're playing blind no matter what, then.

Well, I do know that Heliodor had quite a row last time over wanting to sacrifice themselves, so perhaps we should play the weaken and nullify cards there?
vitalsarecritical: (looking off distantly)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
That sounds just as good of a play as any. We can play nullify, and save weaken for another team?
2xcanoodlingkind: (pic#4852725)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
Alrighty. Who do you suggest?
vitalsarecritical: (paging dr. stiles)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'm really not certain. Ah. . . Iolite, perhaps?
2xcanoodlingkind: (12)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Alright. And reflect? I really don't know near enough about the teams for this.
vitalsarecritical: (surrounded by amateurs)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
Neither do I. Perhaps that is my cue to speak to them more.

Ruby?
2xcanoodlingkind: (8)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
Seems as good as any. I propose we do them in the reverse order! Just to continue our wild guesses. So Nullify last and reflect first.
vitalsarecritical: (welcome to caduceus how may I help you)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Reflect on Ruby first, weaken on Iolite second, and nullify on Heliodor third.
2xcanoodlingkind: (6)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
Done and done. Hopefully those all. Er. Work out.
vitalsarecritical: (but I am currently reading)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
Now we just have to hope our predictions were right, and that no other teams attempt to attack us.
2xcanoodlingkind: (21)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
I have to say I don't have much hope for that, I'm afraid.
vitalsarecritical: (except when you make me mad)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
. . . I was told about what happened in the game where Amethyst was targeted. I'm not certain I have much hope for it, either.

Did we ever figure out which teams targeted us like that?
2xcanoodlingkind: (6)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
Er... nope. Not at all. To be honest I didn't think much of it. We made it through all right and I'm sure no one wanted to do anything to use so much as didn't have much of a choice.
vitalsarecritical: (no you are stupid)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
That's a fair way to look at it. From what I've seen of these games, they don't give anyone many pleasant choices.
2xcanoodlingkind: (pic#4852674)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Precisely. If I'm going to hold a grudge on anyone it's going to be the damnable personae! And believe me I have quite a burr in my behind over those scoundrels.
vitalsarecritical: (derek I am not your gd secretary)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
A burr in your behind is an interesting way to put it. I'm finding myself rather aggravated with them, too.
2xcanoodlingkind: (pic#4852659)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps it's a bit mild but I wouldn't want to be crude in front of a lady.

And speaking of, any idea who's behind this one?
vitalsarecritical: (I disapprove greatly)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Not a single clue, unfortunately. A woman?
2xcanoodlingkind: (pic#4999344)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] 2xcanoodlingkind 2013-01-01 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Hardly much to go on...
vitalsarecritical: (no you are stupid)

Re: discussion

[personal profile] vitalsarecritical 2013-01-01 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
Certainly not the same woman who ran the last unpleasant game. But that doesn't help us much.