[*] Citrine

[dramatispersonae]

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Comments

CARDS

[dramatispersonae]

Re: CARDS

[dramatispersonae]

[ THREE CARDS APPEAR - on one side is an ax, on the other is text. ]

The first reads: "inflect minor injury"
Shes wants REVENGEEEEEE for Kul Elna.

The second reads: "inflict medium injury"
Lambdadelta wants To openly enjoy watching people suffer

The third reads: "inflict major injury"
Obsidian wants to o cut Yuri and Gil off from Vincent

Re: CARDS

[dramatispersonae]

You will play all three cards simultaneously, but choose which order you want them to be used. Reflect turns a card back on whoever played it, nullify cancels a card's action and weaken will bring a card's action down a rank.

The other cards that teams may be playing are martyr cards - a minor, medium or major injury to their own team or adviser cards - reflect a card back to the player, nullify a card's effect and weaken a card's effect. As attacker please choose a team to attack with each of your cards.

discussion

[dramatispersonae]

Re: discussion

[inherited]

Looks like adviser gets people hurt, anyway.

We can do a few things: we can attack a team that we don't think will be defended, we can attack a team that has an adviser, or we can attack a team that's definitely a martyr because that's what they chose. Or we can be random this time through.

Re: discussion

[inherited]

All that said, Carnelian will definitely be taking attack. I also think they wouldn't be surprised by receiving a major attack.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

And that reduces the risk of it getting reflected, too. That works.

[ugh this bullshit :|a his voice is starting to get pretty tight with anger, but he still looks perfectly calm]

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

And they're pulling that stupid trick of trying to get us to hurt people because of things taken out of context, lovely.

[not bothering to split hairs with you on the first point]

And how do we know who chose adviser or martyr? Do you know enough about other teams' play styles?

Re: discussion

[inherited]

Yeah, I'm just ignoring it.

I know about Carnelian's style. I played with one of them recently and he told me how they play to win. Attacker suits them. They wouldn't go for anything that would purposely hurt themselves and they definitely wouldn't do something that would make it difficult to win.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

[nods] So that's a given. Any other teams you know?

Re: discussion

[inherited]

Heliodor probably went martyr, if Sora's there, but they're obviously out of the question. I know Emerald used to play that way a lot, too. ... Turquoise went adviser or martyr. It depends on who's playing. Ruby could go any direction. ... I think we could risk a light hit on the knight. They'd be willing to take it, no matter what move they've chosen. That's how they play.

The rest are wild cards.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

Not all of 'em. But Estelle isn't here. [and thank fuck for that, really]

So minor on the knights, major on Carnelian, and medium on...Turquoise? [mouth twisting] Or I suppose we could risk Emerald...Roxas was the only one I saw at the start, so if they've got three cards too, he's probably walking dead.

Re: discussion

[inherited]

If too many people hit Emerald and Roxas dies, Sora might die, too. I'd prefer at least two hits on Carnelian.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

...wait what.

Re: discussion

[inherited]

It's kind of a long story. Emerald's off limits.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

[what the fuck]

Well, I like Roxas, I'm fine with that.

Re: discussion

[inherited]

But if you want me to be honest, we could play all three on Carnelian. We don't know how many teams they've hurt badly with their style of playing. It might be fitting.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

I've got an acquaintance on Carnelian who's a perfectly decent person. She's tough, but still--I sincerely doubt we're the only ones playing that way. Playing a major attack on them for the strategic reasons you brought up earlier makes sense, but do you really want to make this a revenge gangbang?

Re: discussion

[inherited]

No, I'm trying to justify it, but you're right, it's not a revenge thing. I still think they could handle it.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

If it was just us attacking them, sure, but it's probably not.

Re: discussion

[inherited]

We also don't know how many people took attack. Let's do two to them, one to Sterling.

Re: discussion

[inherited]

And ... sorry you have to do this.

Re: discussion

[chibisama]

Don't apologize for the Personae.

final answer

[dramatispersonae]

Please reply with what order you are playing the cards in and on which teams.

[ ie - 1: major attack on sapphire
2: minor attack on emerald
3: medium attack on coral ]

Re: discussion

[inherited]

minor attack on Kunzite
medium attack on Sterling
major attack on Carnelian