dramatispersonae | Room 1: Jasper, Emerald, Citrine, Iolite, Heliodor

Room 1: Jasper, Emerald, Citrine, Iolite, Heliodor

[When you enter the rooms, they're fairly open and large, with enough space to spread out. On the walls are posters with a list on them:

1. Trickery/mischief?
2. Love?
3. Truth?
4. Snakes?
5. Masks?

Can you ask a question when it depends on the last thing asked? Asked thusly, what would you say? Say what you would freely, or falter? Falter on the same word, or manage to soar?

There is a strange humming sense of expectation in the air.]

((We're playing the questions game with a twist! Each question needs to start with the needs to begin with the last word of the previous question, like in the IC example above. There is a list of themes and starter questions if you'd feel more comfortable springboarding that way -- using one of our starters will not lose you points! You'll have the standard five hours, after which we'll cut you off, but you can pretty much go wild and have as many question conversations as you feel like before you call it quits and head to endgame.))

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Is that all this game is?

Is there something wrong with having a simple game like this?

This is something you would even call a game?

"Game" is what the Personae call it, so why would I argue?

Argue with anything not said in red... isn't that the first thing you learn?

[slept through the night and has recovered some at this point. FURUDO ERIKA, A FANTASTIC START TO ANYONE'S MORNING]

Is that displeasing to you?

...You got of the book already?

"Already" is what you call a month, you hag?

[says this without any particular heat, though]

Hag is the best insult you can come up with after a month to pick?

Pick insults for you--is that what you expect me to waste my time on?

On topic, don't you think this game is too simple?

Simple is preferable to destructive, or don't you agree?

(no subject)

thinkoutsidethebox - 2012-09-09 04:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

debossy - 2012-09-09 04:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

thinkoutsidethebox - 2012-09-09 04:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

debossy - 2012-09-09 05:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

thinkoutsidethebox - 2012-09-09 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

debossy - 2012-09-09 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

thinkoutsidethebox - 2012-09-09 05:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

debossy - 2012-09-09 05:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

thinkoutsidethebox - 2012-09-09 06:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

debossy - 2012-09-09 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

Is there a reason it needs more?

More would make it more of a challenge, and what fun is there in games that are no challenge?

A challenge could come in a lot of forms, like maybe people could make their own challenge for this game?

Game means something you can win, so what would the victory conditions be?

Be something measurable, so perhaps the most complex conversation?

Conversation should follow natural grammatical rules as well, or do you think otherwise?

Otherwise isn't really the question as more of I'm not sure what the natural grammatical rules are, and is there a set that applies across language barriers?