dramatispersonae | Iolite

Skip to Main Content

Iolite

[Upon entering your team's cloud of mist, you find yourselves transported to a bare stone room with a single stone table and chairs. (The chairs have been bolted to the floor.) On the table are a 16 red stones, 8 blue stones, and a 2 black stones. There are also indentations around the edge of the table, each one marked in the color of one of the teams.]

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Ruby's probably gonna come after us.

Turquoise may as well.

... if we play the blue stones all together on a team and play both black stones on the same team, would that steal the protection for us?

Eheh, hey, I bet it would! So we can keep at least some of the assholes off our backs.

That still leaves the question of what to do about those red stones, though...

All on one.

Hahaha~.

Why... and who?

Edited 2012-05-10 23:33 (UTC)

Oh? Do that and you'll just get even more annoying guys on our case. You know they're gonna start sniffing around and pointing fingers to figure out who did it.

It's the most merciful option.

Well, that depends on just what a red stone does. Do we even know that much?

There's an interesting perspective. Which is more merciful, a slap on the wrist for everyone, or as hard a hit as you can muster for one?

And you know it's just gonna be a "slap on the wrist" how?

I don't know what the scale is. But it's still causing the least harm to each, compared with the most harm we can subject to one.

I don't agree with his plan, but I think yours is shit too. You're not putting a stone on Sapphire or Kunzite or I'll make sure you won't be walking for at least a month, got it?

Do it. I have attachments to Sapphire and Tiger's Eye, as well as a knight I care about on Jasper. They'd understand why I'm suggesting this -- and if you think breaking my legs, or whatever other harm you might like to inflict on me, would even that out later, then I'll accept that.

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-10 23:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

[nods in agreement]

Not Kunzite.

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

dormancy - 2012-05-11 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:41 (UTC) - Expand

It likely if everyone gives evenly then none will be spared.

The odds seem to be against teams being spared, regardless.

You just don't want to be culpable.

I'm afraid you've misjudged me. This would minimize the damage to each person, without flinching away from anything -- it treats everyone equally.

Re: Discussion

arbiterary - 2012-05-11 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

arbiterary - 2012-05-11 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

arbiterary - 2012-05-11 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

arbiterary - 2012-05-11 00:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

fallinflames - 2012-05-11 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

We can't be sure our choices will be anonymous either.

Mmm, we would hate to get a bad reputation . . . Haha, not that we don't have one.

Hmm~

Nope, we can't. It's not like I'm afraid of any of these mutts, but it's seriously annoying dealing with just the few that're yapping at us. If any more start up, I'm gonna have to start putting 'em down, you know?

Oh, my, have they already gone that far?

It's your fault in the first place!

To face even someone as frightening as you—Haha, I must have truly upset them.

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

dormancy - 2012-05-11 00:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

uroboric - 2012-05-11 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

dormancy - 2012-05-11 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only