؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2014-07-21 09:11 pm

CORAL

You find yourself in a children’s room. Fortunately, there’s still plenty of room for everyone as either you’re all much, much smaller, or you’re standing in a bedroom for particularly gigantic children...
aristocritical: (don't let's start.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, honestly...

Animals are nice, but for a friend you usually need a human being!
swordhandled: tumblr: dekodomo (PREPARE FOR THE CLAW)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordhandled 2014-07-22 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Not at all! An animal companion can be very faithful and offers a companionship that can be hard found in most people.
eglantinecrown: (Lavender.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] eglantinecrown 2014-07-22 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you really think so?
aristocritical: (I'm afraid I'm unimpressed.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
It's difficult to hold a proper conversation with an animal.

Although I suppose it might be different here.
aristocritical: (perhaps I love you best.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose sometimes, but darling, you make it sound like you haven't found very nice people.
eglantinecrown: (Artemisia.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] eglantinecrown 2014-07-22 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I should think so. And there are plenty of people who do not fall under the umbrella of "human" as well.
swordhandled: pixivid: 2853865 (I wrote FREEDOM in my spellbook)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordhandled 2014-07-22 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Not at all, but I have read many tales that include animal companions.
aristocritical: (aim to shame.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, blast...you're right.
aristocritical: (you're no cause for alarm.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Could those animal companions serve tea?
swordhandled: pixivid: 1931056 (why do i have +2 in rock paper scissors)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordhandled 2014-07-22 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
... I am sure it could have been possible if they were trained.
eglantinecrown: (Saffron Crocus.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] eglantinecrown 2014-07-22 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed, though I haven't gotten us any closer to answering the question.
aristocritical: (pic#7233855)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
[lifts a hand, wiggles her fingers admonishingly]

Is it even physically possible?
aristocritical: (pic#7287717)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose a horse is an elegant enough creature, and useful besides, but with only hooves, it would have trouble serving tea...
swordhandled: (punch a tiger?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordhandled 2014-07-22 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps if a dog holds a plate in their mouth and you balance cups of tea on it...?
eglantinecrown: (1)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] eglantinecrown 2014-07-22 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
The lack of opposable thumbs would make that difficult for most animals, I imagine.
aristocritical: (aim to shame.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Goodness. Would that be sanitary?
aristocritical: (pic#7229110)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Too true! What a dilemma.
swordhandled: pixivid: 1931056 (But does the MurderBeast have an anus?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordhandled 2014-07-22 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps not but it would still be serving tea.
eglantinecrown: (Alstroemeria.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] eglantinecrown 2014-07-22 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps we will have to leave serving the tea to others, and focus on different qualifications for our animal companion.
aristocritical: (pic#7233855)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
And just what do you think those qualifications should be?
aristocritical: (you're no cause for alarm.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] aristocritical 2014-07-22 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I suppose a well-trained dog would be an acceptable friend.
swordhandled: pixivid: 2853865 (shitty bleeding snowman)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordhandled 2014-07-22 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Loyal and friendly and compassionate are qualities that are always desired in friends.

[ nods ]

Page 1 of 3