؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2014-02-25 08:18 pm

GM - Onyx

The room is like any other room, really—a cabin with a door, and windows, and beds. But the fireplace never gets warm, and the beds are hard, and the air is cold.

(Is it familiar, this place? It's hard to tell . . .)

On the table there is food—water, and dry bread, and there is a pot of stew that always stays warm, and full, and smells delicious.

There are also five cards, waiting for your decision.

[full instructions, of which your characters will be ICly aware of the pertinent details]
fraternaldevotion: (shut up about bonds)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps. I still won't go lower than that.
mylittlecavallone: (pic#6613593)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 08:24 am (UTC)(link)
I'll consent to the six card if you agree not to play any cards that will obviously kill someone with their play for the rest of the game.
fraternaldevotion: (108)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 08:44 am (UTC)(link)
. . . For as long as there are cards that can offer enough points instead. And in the case we're only left with cards that might kill someone, we will use the least painful ones.
mylittlecavallone: (No one told me we were doing dumb shit.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 09:00 am (UTC)(link)
Only left with those cards AND don't have enough points to spare to swap our hand.
fraternaldevotion: (ninja of the night)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
And even then, we will have to play some during that round.
mylittlecavallone: (pic#6613593)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I understand that could happen, but I do want to make sure it's only a last option reset and not a play for points.
fraternaldevotion: (don't piss me off)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
It'll be a last option. But if we're hit hard, that's going to be off the table. Do we agree on that?
mylittlecavallone: (Default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
It stays on the table, even then. Otherwise, I'd demand all other considerations be taken off the table as well, if we're going to insist on a 'play to survive and win' scenario.
fraternaldevotion: (no shit sherlock)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't care about winning. I only care about surviving and for that we need enough points for a barrier.
mylittlecavallone: (Default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Enough to attack Emerald too?

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
[what the fuck.]

Enough to attack anybody else, except those we decided not to.
mylittlecavallone: (No one told me we were doing dumb shit.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Uhm no. ]

You can't say we're going to focus on only our team, then double back and say we're also protecting these other teams as well. If you're going to focus on just our team, every team is on the table then.
fraternaldevotion: (108)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I never doubled back.

We're focusing on them too by not hitting them. It's practically all we can do. We'd be focusing more on them if we used the best cards, but you want that off the table unless we've got no other choice.
mylittlecavallone: (Well. Your face.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
And I'm saying you can't claim you're pushing hard to use the ten cards to protect Onyx if you're not willing to hit every team.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
[in a very odd tone.]

You're saying I should be willing to kill my brother, again, if I want to protect Onyx?
mylittlecavallone: (There is no Option B.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Sharply, in return. ]

I'm saying you're acting exactly like the teams I hate being paired up with, who go on and on about how they'll protect only themselves, and oh, these people who are important to them too, and act like it's okay to screw every other team over in the process because they're not important.

Guess what Sasuke, I'm not important to just about every team playing because I don't have any connections. Any protection I receive by being on this team is because of another member of Onyx. I'm fine with the injuries, I those heal, but I don't want to die just because I'm not fucking important enough to someone. So I don't want to kill anyone for that same damn reason.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[moves closer, to attempt to grab Dino's collar.]

No. The difference between them and what I am doing is that I'm aware I'm killing innocent people. That no one deserves to die except for the system that puts us in this situation in the first place. It's not okay and I will never pretend it is.

I don't see it like you do. I do deserve to die, but I just refuse to see Onyx die again.
mylittlecavallone: (pic#6044188)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
No one deserves to die and no one needs to be killed to survive this game. You're Onyx too, idiot.
fraternaldevotion: (don't piss me off)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-26 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I do. And you're wrong about no one needing to be killed to survive this game, Dino.
mylittlecavallone: (No one told me we were doing dumb shit.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-26 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're going to kill other people to try and protect Onyx, I'd rather kill myself at the start then.
fraternaldevotion: (eye of the dragon)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-27 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
[just. looks at Dino for a moment. stepping back, kind of snapping. and by snapping I mean he's closing off completely.]

If you're going to pretend I'm enjoying this, that I want to kill people and then act like you're morally superior. I will save you the trouble.
mylittlecavallone: (pic#6044188)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-27 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
[ Snapping back, frustrated. ]

Play the game however you want then.
fraternaldevotion: (81)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-27 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
[a sardonic, self-deprecating laugh.]

So that's it for you? Fine.
mylittlecavallone: (Default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] mylittlecavallone 2014-02-27 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
[ GONE. ]

[ ... well okay we're stuck in the same room for the rest of the game BUT TOTALLY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROOM NOW. ]
fraternaldevotion: ([blank])

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fraternaldevotion 2014-02-27 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
[Sasuke is just going to avoid everybody from now on. He sits in the opposite corner and closes his eyes. Hands clenched into fists.]