؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2013-10-14 07:05 pm

Emerald

[ When you enter the forest, you find yourself transported to the top of a….tower? But the tower seems to be made of platforms, three candy blocks across, and about ten platforms high. All of the other teams’ towers are visible to you, currently, they look exactly the same.

There are no handrails or edges, and if you peer over the side, you can see that your tower is standing in a lake made of jello. . . ]

[ In the center of your platform, there are three objects floating in midair: a ball of jelly yarn, a piece of pie, and a jawbreaker. If you can’t see, you instinctually know they are there. ]
brotagonist: Lloyd: thinky (if what I say is really so...)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] brotagonist 2013-10-15 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
[I guess we are playing the rest of the game from the arguably-safer Emerald Menace]
fraternalorders: (pic#3070260)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fraternalorders 2013-10-15 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
[is okay with that]

Perhaps we should use one of the food items this time.
brotagonist: Lloyd: ?/shock/neutral/party (zelos zelos heeey zelos)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] brotagonist 2013-10-15 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, we can keep picking away blocks easy enough... on who?
fraternalorders: (And you wouldn't even notice)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fraternalorders 2013-10-15 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
Sapphire or Peridot, perhaps.
brotagonist: Lloyd: thinky (if what I say is really so...)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] brotagonist 2013-10-15 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
Why those two...
fraternalorders: (Like the shadow serpent)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fraternalorders 2013-10-15 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
They seem to be playing rather cautiously.
brotagonist: Lloyd: derp/fond/no eyes/smile/casual (bedside manner)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] brotagonist 2013-10-15 03:25 am (UTC)(link)
Hm... you sure? Sapphire and Peridot will definitely think about trying to get back their own.

[a little amused at the prospect]
fraternalorders: (Relevant to my interests)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fraternalorders 2013-10-15 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
They might. Do you have another preference?
brotagonist: Lloyd: casual/smile/neutral/fond (threw your fear in the sea of no cares.)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] brotagonist 2013-10-15 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
Not really. It could be fun, if you don't mind.
fraternalorders: (People aren't going to know I'm there)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fraternalorders 2013-10-15 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
All right. Cascade agrees, too.
trageteas: (Default)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] trageteas 2013-10-15 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
Let the reckless ones take care of destroying themselves, eh? I think that's a good idea.
fraternalorders: (Relevant to my interests)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fraternalorders 2013-10-15 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
[see, yes, exactly]

It could make things a little more interesting, at least.
trageteas: (pic#5860169)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] trageteas 2013-10-15 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
It's better we get the first blow, too. It might be enough to take them out for good, so I don't see any disadvantages.
fraternalorders: (Like the shadow serpent)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fraternalorders 2013-10-15 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
[nods]

Very well.