؟ (
dramatispersonae) wrote2011-05-17 06:36 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
PERIDOT
[ You're in a room with a tall glass box in the center. Around the glass box are seven desks. On each desk is a paper and three buttons. The only illumination in the room is a single light inside the glass box. ]
Answer truthfully and individually. We'll see how balanced you teams really are.
Answer truthfully and individually. We'll see how balanced you teams really are.
Re: 1. Sacrificing one member of your own team is worth it if it saves two other teams.
Can it be me?
Re: 1. Sacrificing one member of your own team is worth it if it saves two other teams.
. . . and we don't want it to be you.
Re: 1. Sacrificing one member of your own team is worth it if it saves two other teams.
Re: 1. Sacrificing one member of your own team is worth it if it saves two other teams.
Re: 1. Sacrificing one member of your own team is worth it if it saves two other teams.
I'm sorry. I don't know. I... if the question is... about sacrificing you or the... others, I... think it would be no.
Re: 1. Sacrificing one member of your own team is worth it if it saves two other teams.
. . . logistically speaking, without trying to sway you one way or another, the question is deliberately worded so that you cannot answer in such a way as to say "I would sacrifice myself but not sacrifice any of the others." So for you, would the decision not come down to: I feel more strongly about trying to sacrifice myself for the sake of others at the risk of possibly sacrificing one of my teammates; or, I feel more strongly about protecting my teammates and would pass up an opportunity to sacrifice myself to save others to do so.
Re: 1. Sacrificing one member of your own team is worth it if it saves two other teams.