dramatispersonae | [*] Sapphire

[*] Sapphire

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

You can choose to be an attacker, be a martyr or be an adviser. It is hardest to win as an adviser. But to be an attacker you must be callous and to be a martyr you must have a taste for pain.

Also, please name two teams you wish to know more about.

Edited 2012-12-31 22:58 (UTC)

None.

Eh? C-Can we really choose none?

Sure. I'm not going to play along with some ridiculous game like this with no explanation.

What if we ask for an explanation?

Ah, we can ask.

Excuse me, but what is this for?

I thought it to be rather obvious. What sort of games involve attackers and martyrs, after all?

Mm, I see. We're going to have a problem. I'm not going to play this kind of game.

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2012-12-31 23:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2012-12-31 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2012-12-31 23:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

dramatispersonae - 2012-12-31 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2012-12-31 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2012-12-31 23:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2012-12-31 23:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2012-12-31 23:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2012-12-31 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2012-12-31 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2012-12-31 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2012-12-31 23:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2012-12-31 23:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2012-12-31 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

We'll play as advisers, and we're picking Ruby and Jasper for our teams.

[ THREE CARDS APPEAR - on one side is an apple, on the other is text. ]

The first reads: "Reflect"
Dawn wants TO HAVE NEVER EXISTED

The second reads: "Nullify"
Lady wants To kill her sister

The third reads: "Weaken"
Saya wants to emotionally and physically break anyone who hurts those precious to her

You will play all three cards simultaneously, but choose which order you want them to be used. Reflect turns a card back on whoever played it, nullify cancels a card's action and weaken will bring a card's action down a rank.

The other cards that teams may be playing are attack cards - a minor, medium or major injury to another team or martyr cards - a minor, medium or major injury to their own team. As adviser you can try and guess who might play what in which round and do the most 'good'.

[NOPE NOPE NOPE]

[UM THAT FLAVOR TEXT]

Wh . . . what do we do? How can we help if it's just blind guessing??

We can't. It would just be blind guessing.

[addressing the...air, whatever]

Is there a way to find out who is playing what cards?

Of course not, that takes the game part out, doesn't it?

Maybe I don't want to play your stupid game!

But if we don't—! We're always stopping Selenia from doing reckless things . . . but I don't like this either.

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 00:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 00:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 01:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 01:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

dramatispersonae - 2013-01-01 01:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 01:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 01:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 01:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 01:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 01:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

greenthummons - 2013-01-01 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

appleofhiseye - 2013-01-01 02:02 (UTC) - Expand

Please reply with what order you are playing the cards in and on which teams.

[ ie - 1: nullify peridot's card
2: weaken ruby's card
3: reflect emerald's card ]

1. nullify Emerald's card
2. weaken Carnelian's card
3. reflect Iolite's card

Congratulations on choosing well.

Proceed to endgame.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only