dramatispersonae | [*] tiger's eye

Skip to Main Content

[*] tiger's eye

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

You can choose to be an attacker, be a martyr or be an adviser. It is hardest to win as an adviser. But to be an attacker you must be callous and to be a martyr you must have a taste for pain.

Also, please name two teams you wish to know more about.

Edited 2012-12-31 22:55 (UTC)

Attacker or adviser.

. . . Attacker.

Fine by me. Can you be callous, if we need to?

[a beat]

I wouldn't suggest it if I'd be too reluctant.

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

Adviser!

You don't care about winning?

I don't want to be mean for the sake of winning. We've been winning a lot lately.

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2012-12-31 23:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

It says it's difficult to win as one . . .

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2012-12-31 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2012-12-31 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

[ adviser; teams: jasper, kunzite ]

[ THREE CARDS APPEAR - on one side is an apple, on the other is text. ]

The first reads: "Reflect"
Saya doesn't want to be alone.

The second reads: "Nullify"
Beatrice wants to to engage in the occasional burst of murder/torture/gore

The third reads: "Weaken"
Rose loves Tavros on Ruby.

You will play all three cards simultaneously, but choose which order you want them to be used. Reflect turns a card back on whoever played it, nullify cancels a card's action and weaken will bring a card's action down a rank.

The other cards that teams may be playing are attack cards - a minor, medium or major injury to another team or martyr cards - a minor, medium or major injury to their own team. As adviser you can try and guess who might play what in which round and do the most 'good'.

[ah a game that involves predicting what other teams will do, hm]

. . . We should play nullify on a team that's likely to be an attacker, if we know of any.

Edited 2013-01-01 00:10 (UTC)

Carnelian.

[ccconsiders]

. . . I wouldn't disagree. I'm not too sure about other teams, though.

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2013-01-01 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2013-01-01 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 01:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2013-01-01 01:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

ageplay - 2013-01-01 01:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

I don't know if any of the teams are really attackers.

Probably not by nature, but if the game requires it, they might have chosen it to have an advantage over the other teams. Sieh suggested Carnelian, for instance.

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2013-01-01 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2013-01-01 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2013-01-01 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2013-01-01 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

goneastray - 2013-01-01 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: discussion

unsuccessful - 2013-01-01 01:49 (UTC) - Expand

Please reply with what order you are playing the cards in and on which teams.

[ ie - 1: nullify peridot's card
2: weaken ruby's card
3: reflect emerald's card ]

[ 1 - reflect carnelian
2 - weaken peridot
3 - nullify iolite ]

Congratulations on choosing well.

Proceed to endgame.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only