؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-11-23 12:30 am

KNIGHTS

There is cauldron in the center over your area. The walls are tinged in your team's colors, but besides the cauldron, it's bare.

The water in the cauldron is glowing faintly.

Then, Nimue speaks, and as she speaks, the cauldron begins to reflect her vision.

"There lies a kingdom in ruin... Through no fault of its own. All of its inhabitants dead, or lost to the world. Though it lies in ruin, you can see the the faint remnants of the beauty it once contained."

A pause, her voice sounds fainter now.

"Heroes... you have choices that we do not. How... would you use them...?"
noeyeinteam: (17)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
--ah.

Depends.

This Mordred--if he was trusted enough, he would have his own guard. So there would have to be enough to combat against them.
legitimizes: (Acting like you're comatose)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:02 pm (UTC)(link)
He'd have to be discredited before the king left.
noeyeinteam: (22)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)
If he has the king's trust, it will be difficult to discredit him.

Plus, he has magic. He could use that.
legitimizes: (Won't make you notice me)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not like we're helpless ourselves. Waiting until he lets the enemies inside to stop him is too risky.
noeyeinteam: (53)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree.

Disrupting the signal to allow the enemy in would be priority if we know who is the guilty party.

[or we could just kill him and face the king's wrath buuut...]
legitimizes: (Acting like you're comatose)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:13 pm (UTC)(link)
We could just wait to confirm who he is and kill him quietly.
noeyeinteam: (25)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
... and then the king would figure us for traitors.

Let's not get executed by our king.
legitimizes: (Or a preacher's pet in drag)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Thus the "quietly".
noeyeinteam: (88)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:16 pm (UTC)(link)
How about we save the murder for when we can be assured he hasn't left other things in play and our king won't find out.
legitimizes: (Banging on a kettledrum)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Alright, so find him and keep close tabs on him, while cutting off his ability to act.

That's risky though.

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam - 2012-11-23 12:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes - 2012-11-23 12:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam - 2012-11-23 12:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes - 2012-11-23 12:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam - 2012-11-23 12:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes - 2012-11-23 12:37 (UTC) - Expand
justaking: (Default)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] justaking 2012-11-23 12:15 pm (UTC)(link)
The problem is confirming who he is. If he's subtle, it's possible he may place a scapegoat.
legitimizes: (Acting like you're comatose)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)
It's possible, but unless we wait until the last minute, won't that always be a risk?
justaking: (How do you even say this?)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] justaking 2012-11-23 12:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Killing on suspicion alone isn't beneficial. You may end up killing allies and doing the traitor a favor.
legitimizes: (But man I never saw it commin')

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Then cut off his actions as we confirm it.
virtuallyroyalty: (Welcome To Corneria)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
There's another way! this guy... if he's set up a time and place with the enemy, that means there's got to be communication between the two! How about finding a way to disrupt or change what's communicated?
noeyeinteam: (50)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)
That would actually be pretty effective. The problem is knowing how to and which enemy he would be communicating with, through which medium.

He's subtle, so it wouldn't be overt like a message.
virtuallyroyalty: (you can be the rook or the pawn)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:06 pm (UTC)(link)
There'd definitely be traces though, and, I mean... like I said, there has to be more than one subtle and smart guy who can use magic. So how about just finding a guy that's loyal to the king, who could do that!
noeyeinteam: (39)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:07 pm (UTC)(link)
So take on a magic-user loyal to the king to find it out.

Sounds like a plan.

But there's still be the issue of discrediting Mordred enough so that he won't have another chance at it.
virtuallyroyalty: (All Up To You)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't finding the messages alone discredit him?
noeyeinteam: (42)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Again, you're assuming that he won't have a backup plan to ensure the messages cannot fall into the wrong hands.

Or that it's even a physical message. Magic, remember.
virtuallyroyalty: (allergic to routine)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Argh, now who's over-complicating...! I don't have a better idea, do you?
noeyeinteam: (17)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not. You're the one who established he's subtle. Subtle means not getting caught which means knowing the best ways to communicate without being revealed. How else would he have set up this appointment with the enemy?

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam - 2012-11-23 12:15 (UTC) - Expand
brotagonist: Lloyd: facepalm/grump (HEROIC MIGRAINE)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist 2012-11-23 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Not if they don't have his name or it's not enough proof. He could say he was framed.
virtuallyroyalty: (please wait your keyword is loading.)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
But it'll definitely put him in suspicion at least! That stuff sticks, and people'll definitely be way more watchful! At the very least, he'd be under pressure.
brotagonist: Lloyd: srs/neutral/blankface/grump (follow the leader down)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist 2012-11-23 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
It's the first step! So what's the second step?

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist - 2012-11-23 12:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist - 2012-11-23 12:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist - 2012-11-23 12:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist - 2012-11-23 12:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:39 (UTC) - Expand