؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-11-23 12:30 am

KNIGHTS

There is cauldron in the center over your area. The walls are tinged in your team's colors, but besides the cauldron, it's bare.

The water in the cauldron is glowing faintly.

Then, Nimue speaks, and as she speaks, the cauldron begins to reflect her vision.

"There lies a kingdom in ruin... Through no fault of its own. All of its inhabitants dead, or lost to the world. Though it lies in ruin, you can see the the faint remnants of the beauty it once contained."

A pause, her voice sounds fainter now.

"Heroes... you have choices that we do not. How... would you use them...?"
antreegonist: Mithos: neutral/questioning (I told you to get rid of deathcat!)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Which is...?
antreegonist: (the indwelling.)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Could we...

*frowns*

Disrupt him? Open negotiations and conciliation with the attacking party before they ever struck the kingdom?
antreegonist: Mithos: serious/tired (crosses.)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, would these hypothetical attackers be open to it.
antreegonist: Mithos: symbolic/hand/Emerald (up so floating many bells down.)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:15 pm (UTC)(link)
...well, there's an option to try, then.
virtuallyroyalty: (multi platform)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Aah, that's not a bad way either. Goes together with the idea to disrupt communications too, and if the enemy testifies about the traitor then-- that works too, right?
antreegonist: Mithos: serious (doesn't that sound familiar?)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
*calmer now...*

Even if they didn't, it'd be enough to buy time for a while -- generally they'd go under truce while the negotiations lasted. And if it works...the traitor doesn't have any means.
virtuallyroyalty: (zz pawn)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Blurgh yeah, but feelings calming down means feeling bad about it. Especially with Mithos so calm. ]

Right.

.... aah, look, I can't stand the tension so I'm gonna say right out: Sorry for losing my temper at you guys last round! It's better to address this now rather than later, especially when we're talking about this kind of thing! I mean-- think about it, if there's a guy willing to betray someone, there's definitely a bunch of bad feelings involved! That's no good! and then we're talking about reconciliation, and... whatever, the point is you guys aren't my enemy!
antreegonist: Mithos: surprise/derp (not a caravan of despair.)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)
*s-suprised! drags a hand back through his hair uncertainly*

Uh -- wow, well, okay...no, no, we're not. Sorry for yelling at you so much, that didn't help or anything. We can move on?
virtuallyroyalty: (fight woosh)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Right, sure!

[ Kind of... relieved, and smiles brilliantly at Mithos! ]

Seriously, that was stupid... and what we're talking about just brings it home! Anyway, Lloyd and I had an idea about the King talking to the traitor too and try and make up, if we're gonna go that way. I mean... why not try?
antreegonist: Mithos: derp/questioning/party(Genis) (hey halcyon days.)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
*i don't understand what just happened but this is a lot better than being furious at your face so it works*

But the King doesn't know who the traitor is, right -- hell, maybe the answer is to give the king bonding time with all of his knights. That's like extra extra loyalty on top of trying to untraitor the traitor guy.
virtuallyroyalty: (Ignored Epiphany)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
There was an idea of finding a guy who could track the traitor and the messages down... but that works too!
noeyeinteam: (49)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
... you guys... do know allowing the traitor to get anywhere near the king is just asking for someone to get backstabbed literally somewhere, right?
brotagonist: Lloyd: ?/shock/neutral/party (zelos zelos heeey zelos)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist 2012-11-23 12:43 pm (UTC)(link)
[elbows Kazuki a bit :U]

I said I don't think we should have him let on he knows who he is.
virtuallyroyalty: (jiggle physics)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Then just do what Mithos said and make it a thing which happens with everyone! That works too, right? and this guy is meant to be subtle, subtle, he's not just gonna stab the guy! I swear it could work and the guy could reconsider, I'm not saying let the guard down completely!

[ He's just got a simple world view ok ]
noeyeinteam: (63)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam 2012-11-23 12:46 pm (UTC)(link)
[... I am skeptical of this "hugs will make everything better" answer]
legitimizes: (Or a preacher's pet in drag)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:46 pm (UTC)(link)
[I am not commenting.]

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist - 2012-11-23 12:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist - 2012-11-23 12:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist - 2012-11-23 12:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 12:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] brotagonist - 2012-11-23 12:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty - 2012-11-23 13:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam - 2012-11-23 13:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes - 2012-11-23 13:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam - 2012-11-23 12:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes - 2012-11-23 12:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] noeyeinteam - 2012-11-23 12:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes - 2012-11-23 12:57 (UTC) - Expand
legitimizes: (Acting like you're comatose)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
[Why are you guys making up boo.]
virtuallyroyalty: (nyo~ron)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-11-23 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)
[ sorry dude, deal with it ]
legitimizes: (Speaking like a country rose)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:43 pm (UTC)(link)
[Oh well it was good while it lasted and now I know some huge buttons for Mithos and Lloyd.]
antreegonist: Mithos: surprise/derp/party(Genis/Colette/Lloyd) (kittens!  inspired by kittens!)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] antreegonist 2012-11-23 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
*POSITIVE FEELS ARE DELICIOUS TOO*
legitimizes: (Gonna let myself go soon)

Re: Scenario two

[personal profile] legitimizes 2012-11-23 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
[Well yes they are, somehow just not as fun for the sadist in me.]