؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-09-22 08:33 am

RUBY

You can see the other teams, but there is an invisible barrier preventing you from hearing them. You can assume that they can't hear you, either. There is a hefty serving of sweet wine and liquor, should you choose it. With a loaf of bread that you can slice. Nimue is in the center of the formation of teams, and when she speaks, you can hear her loud and clear.

"Storytelling has been a tradition of the knights of Camelot for some time. They would tell of the awesome feats of their king, and of their fellow knights... and... they were also prone to exaggeration in some cases."

There appears a small set of cards next to the liquor. You can read them, or you can implicitly understand them if you can't read.

"What feats have the heroes of Aather accomplished, I wonder? And what... exaggerations they may take? Before you, you will find prompts for your tales. You will write one for yourselves, for a set of knights, and for another team. I will select the most inspiring, as will your peers."

She tilts her head. "Ah, perhaps it is bad to encourage grandstanding..."

But before you can ask her, she vanishes.
wildnight: ([f] accidentally graceful)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] wildnight 2012-09-23 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
We will come up with something.
justaking: (Default)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] justaking 2012-09-23 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
[Overhearing the other conversation]

Which leaves Tiger's Eye and their own dilemma.
wildnight: ([f] intoxication)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] wildnight 2012-09-23 03:36 am (UTC)(link)
Tiger's Eye would overcome, obviously.
justaking: (Curious)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] justaking 2012-09-23 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
[???] Of course they would, they're an impressive team. We just need to say how they did it.
wildnight: ([f] night winds)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] wildnight 2012-09-23 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
Who is the villain?
justaking: (I am bloody well peachy thanks)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] justaking 2012-09-23 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
If it's some villain beyond compare, we might not have to say a name as long as we make the villain sound horrible enough.
wildnight: ([f] and reprieve)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] wildnight 2012-09-23 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
That could be. But then he would have to do something particularly horrible.
justaking: (Default)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] justaking 2012-09-23 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
Hmmm... eating worlds?
wildnight: ([f] out of the darkness)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] wildnight 2012-09-23 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose that would be bad enough, for mortals. All right.
justaking: (Whatever it is seems fair)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] justaking 2012-09-23 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
[Hmm]

We could just say they triumphed in battle. Or perhaps they won by wit.
wildnight: ([f] holy night)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] wildnight 2012-09-23 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
Either seems possible with that team.
justaking: (Default)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] justaking 2012-09-23 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
Or both. They battled their way through the villain's forces until they reached him and then tricked him into destroying himself.
wildnight: ([f] accidentally graceful)

Re: GENERAL DISCUSSION

[personal profile] wildnight 2012-09-23 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I would be satisfied with that.