؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-09-07 11:59 pm

Room 2: Peridot, Coral, Sapphire, Tiger's Eye, Kunzite

[When you enter the rooms, they're fairly open and large, with enough space to spread out. On the walls are posters with a list on them:

1. Trickery/mischief?
2. Love?
3. Truth?
4. Snakes?
5. Masks?

Can you ask a question when it depends on the last thing asked? Asked thusly, what would you say? Say what you would freely, or falter? Falter on the same word, or manage to soar?


There is a strange humming sense of expectation in the air.]

((We're playing the questions game with a twist! Each question needs to start with the needs to begin with the last word of the previous question, like in the IC example above. There is a list of themes and starter questions if you'd feel more comfortable springboarding that way -- using one of our starters will not lose you points! You'll have the standard five hours, after which we'll cut you off, but you can pretty much go wild and have as many question conversations as you feel like before you call it quits and head to endgame..))
genderbinary: (Walked right into my mirror)

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-09-09 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
Not that I don't appreciate a game of words, but I haven't noticed any particular elements of the game that point us in the direction of a goal we must work towards, have you?
glorious: (intrigue)

[personal profile] glorious 2012-09-09 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
You see the list that's on the wall, do you think that's meant to be a clue?
genderbinary: <user name="piecrumbs" site="www.livejournal.com"> (Orange+75=Canada...?)

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-09-09 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
Clue us in on our topics, yes, but since they are only there for suggestion and not strictly necessary as part of our involvement, isn't it the case that we are essentially on our own?
glorious: (wary)

[personal profile] glorious 2012-09-09 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
"Own our topic" may be what we're meant to do as well; though don't you wish they had clearer criteria?
genderbinary: <user name="piecrumbs" site="www.livejournal.com"> (You're soooooooooooo good)

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-09-09 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
Criteria or not, couldn't they at least have been less vague earlier?
glorious: (intrigue)

[personal profile] glorious 2012-09-09 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
Earlier games suggest that being straightforward is more difficult for them, now doesn't that make you wonder as to the purpose of this?