؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-05-10 05:13 pm

Iolite

[Upon entering your team's cloud of mist, you find yourselves transported to a bare stone room with a single stone table and chairs. (The chairs have been bolted to the floor.) On the table are a 16 red stones, 8 blue stones, and a 2 black stones. There are also indentations around the edge of the table, each one marked in the color of one of the teams.]
sticksofthejedi: (attentive)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi 2012-05-11 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
You disagree?
playfreebird: (not really)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] playfreebird 2012-05-11 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
Not that it's a logical conclusion. Not the one I would have reached though, I suppose.
fallinflames: (dere deep inside)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames 2012-05-11 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't have called it logical, but it's an option. What would you do with them?
playfreebird: (not really)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] playfreebird 2012-05-11 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
I would probably play the red and blue stones on the same team, at this point, and use the black stones on two other teams.
fallinflames: (this is what i see)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames 2012-05-11 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
All on one? There's been some discussion of picking a few teams to spread the burden.
Edited 2012-05-11 00:50 (UTC)
playfreebird: (facing a mirror)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] playfreebird 2012-05-11 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
I said all on one, yes.
fallinflames: (frazzling in the brain pan)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames 2012-05-11 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
It keeps coming down to this then. Who would you pick to place them all on?
dormancy: (class and manners.)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy 2012-05-11 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Jasper . . . ? They have a lot of knights.
playfreebird: (stand beside)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] playfreebird 2012-05-11 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
...They are a new team. Others might be less likely to steal their defense, at least.
dormancy: (bath time is my favorite time. ♥)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy 2012-05-11 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
And more likely to give them defense, too. If our actions are revealed, then it would look threatening to a number of establish teams. So, we can leave it to them to decide what they will from it. Besides, they're a very clever group.
sticksofthejedi: (attentive)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi 2012-05-11 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
You were one of the first to suggest distributing them evenly. What changed your mind?
dormancy: (i've got a phosphorescent secret.)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy 2012-05-11 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
It would spare everyone else if one team takes on the burden. We'll give them all of our defense to soften the blow.
sticksofthejedi: (dubious)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi 2012-05-11 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
The odds are against sparing anyone, even if we concentrate on just one team.
dormancy: (fuck chicks man.)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy 2012-05-11 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
If everyone else decides to spread it evenly and lay everyone equally to waste, then they are welcome to. We won't add to anyone else's trouble if we keep our stones together.
sticksofthejedi: (armcross)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi 2012-05-11 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
That's a bit of a misleading presentation. No matter how you look at it, we're adding to someone else's trouble.

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy - 2012-05-11 01:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 01:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy - 2012-05-11 01:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy - 2012-05-11 01:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 01:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy - 2012-05-11 01:44 (UTC) - Expand
fallinflames: (in this case it was)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames 2012-05-11 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Jaina, there's no way for us to be accountable for the other team's choices. We need to look at this from what we're doing and we alone.
sticksofthejedi: (attentive)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi 2012-05-11 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
And if we're looking only at what we're doing, do we do as little damage to each team, or badly hurt one team?

Have you changed your mind from earlier, Spitfire?
Edited 2012-05-11 01:20 (UTC)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames - 2012-05-11 01:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 01:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames - 2012-05-11 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi - 2012-05-11 01:37 (UTC) - Expand
playfreebird: (Default)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] playfreebird 2012-05-11 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Because there gets to be a point where spreading out the pain doesn't accomplish that much.
sticksofthejedi: (attentive)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] sticksofthejedi 2012-05-11 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
[...sigh, but finally nodding.]
fallinflames: (what interests me...)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames 2012-05-11 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
... They might get a higher level of defense in preference to their newness as well.

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] uroboric 2012-05-11 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
It'd look pretty shitty to target a new team.
dormancy: (fuck chicks man.)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy 2012-05-11 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
Mm, there is that chance. But who would you have take their place?

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] uroboric 2012-05-11 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
I already said what I thought we oughta do. You've already decided to ignore it.
dormancy: (class and manners.)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] dormancy 2012-05-11 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
Mmm, I've decided that we've discussed more than enough. So, you would like spread it out, then?
fallinflames: (this is how. this is why.)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fallinflames 2012-05-11 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
They're likely to get protection from it though. [sighs] It's a pretty shitty game in general, honestly, no matter who we target. If you go by Vincent's criteria, there are several other teams with a number of knights on them as well.