؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-05-10 05:11 pm

Tiger's Eye

[Upon entering your team's cloud of mist, you find yourselves transported to a bare stone room with a single stone table and chairs. (The chairs have been bolted to the floor.) On the table are a 16 red stones, 8 blue stones, and a 2 black stones. There are also indentations around the edge of the table, each one marked in the color of one of the teams.]
genderbinary: <user name="thejobbernowl" site="www.livejournal.com"> (House of cards you fall hard)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-05-11 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying we should put all of the stones on us. But if we can take a few, I think it would put everyone on an even ground and be the most fair decision.
virtuallyroyalty: (life imitates a game of chess)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-05-11 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Bullshit. This isn't a fair situation in the first place, and you can't pretend you're making it one. Trying to "play fair" by handicapping yourself isn't ever going to make sense, and it won't be fair to you, to your team, to us, and to the other people that care about you. If this was a different situation I'd say go right on ahead, but it isn't. This is survival. All it will do is make us a softer target for the people not playing fair, and all you have to legitimize it is that "you can take it better". Which you have no proof of. At all!
Edited 2012-05-11 00:15 (UTC)
genderbinary: (No I'm not complaining)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-05-11 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
Do you have any enemies we should be concerned about on other teams that are more likely to attack us? Because that isn't nearly as big a concern as you seem to think it is.
virtuallyroyalty: (going through the motions)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-05-11 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
You... are seriously stupid, if you think it's not worthy of concern at all, or if it even matters whether or not you have enemies this way. "Process of elimination" mean anything to you?
genderbinary: (You could help her)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-05-11 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't say that either. You're deliberately misinterpreting my words and being condescending when I am trying to offer suggestions that will make this game as fair as possible.
virtuallyroyalty: (ANOTHER WATER TEMPLE)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-05-11 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
Because I'm kind of against self-harm tactics on principle and if I can avoid it, then I damn well will! You're not being a hero or playing fair, since this game by nature isn't playing fair.

So... look, I get it, I'm not going to hold it against you. But it does really tick me off!
genderbinary: ([all the voices never stop])

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-05-11 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
[seething for a moment, absolutely furious]
genderbinary: (Pay to call home)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-05-11 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
[then, clears her throat and forces herself to stop shaking]

Very well. I apologize for suggesting we use your lives as part of Tiger's Eye's decision. We will come to a conclusion that avoids self-harm.
virtuallyroyalty: (simple minded wisdom)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-05-11 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
. . . thanks. And... ugh, you probably don't care since we really obviously don't agree. But for what it's worth, I'm sorry.
genderbinary: ([all the voices never stop])

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] genderbinary 2012-05-11 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
I would gladly take your job given the opportunity. That's all I have to say.
virtuallyroyalty: (the three trials)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-05-11 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
[ ... IDGI? ]

Personally, I think I'd prefer to be on a team. And it's not like heroes haven't become knights before, you know. A guy who used to be on Turquoise asked Maleficent.

But if that's all you have to say, then we can leave it at that.
Edited 2012-05-11 04:16 (UTC)