dramatispersonae | KNIGHT GROUP B

Skip to Main Content

KNIGHT GROUP B

You're in a wide, bright room with beaten copper walls. The ceiling is a frosted glass dome etched with leaves and thorns and flowers.

There's a table with some sheets of paper and a brilliant red quill pen with a very sharp, fine tip; it's only warm to the touch, but that tip scorches words into the paper rather than using any ink. Testing it on your skin might not be wise.

Another copper bird sits on the table with the papers, and serves as the quill stand.

((HEYLISTEN MAKE IT THREE SCENARIOS FOR PART TWO, INSTEAD OF FIVE))

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Acting's not so bad. So, where should we start?

I suppose we should establish our "characters"?

Do we wanna keep a running theme? The scenes could be standalones, right?

That would also work. It simply seems like it would be easier to think of themes for scenes if everyone had different relationships established!

Going with a running theme keeps us a little more focused, unless we like that kinda freedom of choice.

And it would make things go quicker, I imagine.

Sounds like that's probably that, huh? I'm fine with it.

If we're doing a circus, you should be a lion tamer. You've got the whip.

Are you volunteering to be the lion then?

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

dramatispersonae - 2012-01-29 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

lunarpsychole - 2012-01-29 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

lunarpsychole - 2012-01-29 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

lunarpsychole - 2012-01-29 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

dramatispersonae - 2012-01-29 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

lunarpsychole - 2012-01-29 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

buddingromance - 2012-01-29 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-29 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-29 00:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

mylittlecavallone - 2012-01-29 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

Sounds like we can do just about anything.

We just means we've gotta narrow it down quick, or we could be stuck whining about it for a while.

Don't care, as long as it's exciting.

Circus?

As long as I don't have to be a clown.

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

edgeofjustice - 2012-01-29 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

Deciding whether it'll be standalone scenarios or different parts of a whole, perhaps.

Yeah, that's what me an' J—Lady's Slipper there were talkin' about. Thoughts?

It might be easier to tell a single connected story, but different scenarios allow for the potential of more creativity. Either has its benefits.

We are thinking circus. Saix will be the dancing bear.

You can be the dazzlingly pretty ringleader.

Re: PART TWO

quercusoptima - 2012-01-28 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

quercusoptima - 2012-01-29 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Are there really no requirements we're supposed to meet for this?

It doesn't appear so ...

That is too vague. Could it be part of the challenge for this game?

It might be, but I think a certain amount of capriciousness is encouraged.

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-28 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

quercusoptima - 2012-01-28 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-29 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

quercusoptima - 2012-01-29 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-29 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

quercusoptima - 2012-01-29 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

Sorta makes it a bit harder, hey?

Considerably harder, I would say. It would help if we knew what sort of scenarios will lead us to victory.

Exactly, exactly right~ showing creativity is a lot more subjective.

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-29 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-29 00:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

unwieldyfate - 2012-01-29 00:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PART TWO

the_ex_flame - 2012-01-29 00:16 (UTC) - Expand

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only