؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2011-10-01 05:45 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Entry tags:

Game 73: Iolite

[ You find yourself in an empty banquet hall. At one end of the room is a long table, on the surface of which you'll find a blank sheet of paper, a pen, and a pot of ink. ]
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
ambassador: (I don't want to hear this)

Re: Discuss

[personal profile] ambassador 2011-10-02 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps a more realistic way to put it would be, if someone seemed likely to be about to kill or seriously injure somebody I cared about, including myself, I'd kill them first if I could.
dormancy: (class and manners.)

Re: Discuss

[personal profile] dormancy 2011-10-02 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, of course. Well, I wouldn't disagree with that. It would be a bit of a stretch to kill another team in a game that didn't require it as in game's past, so . . . That would be our limit, I imagine.
dormancy: (fuck chicks man.)

Re: Answer

[personal profile] dormancy 2011-10-02 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
Circumstances, though.

What if you could kill one to save everyone else from being killed?
ambassador: (proceed with caution)

Re: Answer

[personal profile] ambassador 2011-10-02 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
...I think it depends who that one is. I feel like the obvious answer should be yes, but I'm not that unselfish. If the one who had to die was someone I cared for... I think I'd keep trying to look for another answer, even if in the end there wasn't one.
dormancy: (i've got a phosphorescent secret.)

Re: Answer

[personal profile] dormancy 2011-10-02 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
So, it would still be the same answer—Of you and yours before them.
dormancy: (bath time is my favorite time. ♥)

Re: Answer

[personal profile] dormancy 2011-10-02 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Mm, honest.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only