Skip to Main Content
؟ (
dramatispersonae
) wrote
2011
-
02
-
12
08:13 pm
Entry tags:
!days 001-030
,
-tiger's eye
,
¡game 009
,
•madame white
,
•rumpelstiltskin
Tiger's Eye
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Discuss
dramatispersonae
2011-02-13 05:39 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Re: Discuss
iwantyour
2011-02-13 05:44 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Up to you guys.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 05:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Okay! You were pretty cool, yeah.
Re: Discuss
iwantyour
2011-02-13 05:47 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I was happy to help.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 05:48 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Heh, thanks! We owe you one.
Re: Discuss
deadlyfurniture
2011-02-13 05:44 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I think we were the best next to Turquoise.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 05:45 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I don't think we should vote for ourselves, though.
Re: Discuss
deadlyfurniture
2011-02-13 05:50 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Even if we genuinely think we made a better effort than the other teams?
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 05:52 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Yeah.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 05:54 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Maybe we can if we don't place more points on ourselves than we do on other teams?
Re: Discuss
reducedtoasch
2011-02-13 05:54 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Should we be voting strictly on appearance or mannerisms as well?
Re: Discuss
deadlyfurniture
2011-02-13 05:55 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I think we should take their manner into account too.
Re: Discuss
reducedtoasch
2011-02-13 05:58 am (UTC)
(
link
)
... Turquoise did the best in mannerisms and appearance then.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 06:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Yeah! I thought he was a girl, too.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 05:51 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Okay. I think maybe we should place points on Ruby, Turquoise and Emerald? Without counting ourselves, they did a great job.
Re: Discuss
deadlyfurniture
2011-02-13 05:53 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Our guy looked better than Faith did.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 05:55 am (UTC)
(
link
)
That's true.
Um. Ruby and Turquoise, then?
Re: Discuss
deadlyfurniture
2011-02-13 05:57 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Four to Turquoise, three to Ruby, three to us.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 06:00 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Okay. Only because Gramps was really great.
Re: Discuss
deadlyfurniture
2011-02-13 06:01 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Yeah. I mean, it's barely even voting for ourselves since he's not technically on our team.
Re: Discuss
highasakite
2011-02-13 06:03 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Heh. Yeah, I would've voted for him.
Re: Discuss
deadlyfurniture
2011-02-13 06:05 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Exactly.
174 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Um. Ruby and Turquoise, then?
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss
Re: Discuss