؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2014-02-25 08:19 pm

GM - Sterling 1

The room is like any other room, really—a cabin with a door, and windows, and beds. But the fireplace never gets warm, and the beds are hard, and the air is cold.

(Is it familiar, this place? It's hard to tell . . .)

On the table there is food—water, and dry bread, and there is a pot of stew that always stays warm, and full, and smells delicious.

There are also five cards, waiting for your decision.

[full instructions, of which your characters will be ICly aware of the pertinent details]
adogchasingcars: (well we had a plan!)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
[picking at the food, and waves a hand]

Gonna ditto Mr. Rogers over there. I'm down with going the 'not at all' route and doing the lotto thing. Knights shouldn't be dishing out this kinda stuff, yeah?
dailydouble: (pic#6379796)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
The teams will "dish it out". Being a knight does not give us any great moral authority here. We can do as we wish.
adogchasingcars: (we cool)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
Aaand I think most knights wish to not to break their normal moral codes for a game? Most! Not all. Don't wanna speak for everyone, heh.

Anyway, why not play low unless our hand is forced? Like I said, we can try that uh, lotto thing, too, if we want a winning shot.
dailydouble: (pic#6965031)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
. . . perhaps it would be best if I stopped contributing. The rest of you seem to form a consensus, while I am the only outlier.
adogchasingcars: (aww yeah puppy bowl is on)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
Woah there, outvoted doesn't mean outcast, buddy. You telling me you can't help any other way? You've gotta have some advice for a newbie like me.
dailydouble: (pic#6379821)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
[dryly] Yes, I suppose I could help by taking one of the cards sent to us later.
adogchasingcars: (leeets not talk about that)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
[crosses his arms, making an X]

Dude, I'm hurt! We're a team, man, I don't want you getting hit either. What I'm asking is your opinions on the hero teams. You've been here longer than I have, yeah? Any idea who takes what better, even for light stuff?
dailydouble: (pic#6379807)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
Does it matter? The lighter cards seem to be things that nearly anyone could handle.
adogchasingcars: (can't be helped)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
Dunno! If you had a friend out there I wouldn't want to accidentally give 'em an upset stomach, no matter how harmless it seems.
dailydouble: (pic#6965052)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
I don't care what you pick.
adogchasingcars: (wink wink nudge nudge)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
Bro, if you didn't care, you wouldn't have given your opinion in the first place. [nudges him]

C'mon, I'm all ears. Let's pretend for a moment! If we had played that thorns card, who would you not give it to?
dailydouble: (pic#6965034)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
I would assign the cards randomly and spread out over as many teams as possible. Playing favorites in a game such as this has always struck me as somewhat hypocritical.
adogchasingcars: (dogs can't eat chocolate)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
[thinks on that a bit]

You know what? You're right. If we're gonna take the moral high ground--[air quotes]--can't go around thinking one team is more important than the other, yeah?
dailydouble: (pic#6323402)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
Choose a team likely to be avoided by others, perhaps.
adogchasingcars: (one moment please)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
. . .I was gonna suggest the other Sterling bunch, but given our roles, we're gonna get slammed, huh?
dailydouble: (pic#6379796)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 03:57 am (UTC)(link)
It would be a fair assumption.
adogchasingcars: (welp)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
[s o b]

Well in that case, I kinda do wanna go ahead and give them the really light card. They're in the same position we are. The heroes can deal with everything else after we see how this goes.

Thanks, man.
dailydouble: (pic#6323402)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
. . . you continue to want to send the other knights the card, after we discussed how they are likely to be targeted by many others?

[you're getting a major side-eye]
adogchasingcars: (not as planned)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
[rubs the back of his head]

I know, I know, way to lay it on our own, yeah? But I figure if we hit 'em with a pillow now, we don't bring 'em back up by chance we don't have any choice but to play something a little rougher.

We're separated, but we're still a team. Onyx, too. I won't play favorites with the heroes, but the other knights. . .I want this to be the only thing we ever send their way.
dailydouble: (pic#6379796)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
The only thing the rules prevent is hitting the same team more than once in the same day. Tomorrow, we can choose any team again. We do nothing to protect any team by picking them now.
adogchasingcars: (hey cowgirl)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
[laughs]

I could be imagining it, but it's starting to sound like you care a lot more than you let on, dude.

Alright, I'll ask the others if we can swap to--Iolite? I actually like them, but hey, like you said, no sense in being hypocritical. How's that sound?
dailydouble: (pic#6323402)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
Do what you want. My only concern was that your reasoning may be based on false assumptions.
adogchasingcars: (can't be helped)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
My reasoning's only based on what feels right, bro. But you gave us some leeway, it's only fair to give you some, too.
dailydouble: (pic#6323405)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble 2014-02-26 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
[shakes his head]
adogchasingcars: (trust me on this)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars 2014-02-26 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
[lightly punches at his shoulder]

C'mon man, loosen up. And seriously, thanks for the tips. It's one less thing for us to scramble our brains about.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] dailydouble - 2014-02-26 11:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] adogchasingcars - 2014-02-26 12:14 (UTC) - Expand