؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2014-11-19 10:35 pm

CORAL, CARNELIAN, and SAPPHIRE

[ You sit on a soft, slightly damp white mass--a solid cloud keeping you up in the sky. Beneath you stretches the village you saw from the Ring, but this time, you can also make out the tiny forms of all the knights. You know it's them, even though they're too far away for you to make out details. ]
sheardelight: ✖ pixiv id=4007160 (you strip the buttons off my coat)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] sheardelight 2014-11-21 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
[UH]

Keep it at bay how? Smiting it with blasts of holy fire?
masterofmystery: (pic#7740023)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] masterofmystery 2014-11-21 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
[ . . . ]

I dunno about this one.
masterofmystery: (pic#7822110)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] masterofmystery 2014-11-21 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Well, if it's the Darkness it's more about feelings and friendship and all that...
dicktionary: (pic#6645243)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] dicktionary 2014-11-21 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
I guess it depends on how biblical we're going.
sheardelight: (you're bound to choke)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] sheardelight 2014-11-21 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Fire sounds more exciting.
sheardelight: ❚ commissioned ➻ credit if taken (before you know,before you know)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] sheardelight 2014-11-21 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
I think it'd work better than a plague.
inviseyeble: ([shocked turn] black cherry)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] inviseyeble 2014-11-21 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
Is that really the important part here?

[teammate...]
dicktionary: (pic#6644837)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] dicktionary 2014-11-21 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
His idea is less likely to get one of Knights accidentally killed.
inviseyeble: ([talking] white chocolate raspberry)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] inviseyeble 2014-11-21 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Well this time we're supposed to protect the knights, right? Usually knights protect others and this time it's the other way around.

I don't get the designing an angel part as much...
masterofmystery: (pic#7740029)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] masterofmystery 2014-11-21 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe, but it hasn't worked on it yet. Well, 'less their getting caught on fire by searing declarations of love or something...
dicktionary: (pic#7500157)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] dicktionary 2014-11-21 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no. I'm not sure how well that'd work on the Darkness anyway.
masterofmystery: (pic#7858056)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] masterofmystery 2014-11-21 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
I dunno. As far as I've seen everyone protects each other. S'not just one or the other.

Well, designing one's just dumb...
sheardelight: ❚ pixiv id=4007160 (you are made of sugar,milk and molasses)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] sheardelight 2014-11-21 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
[but doesn't destruction sound cool???]

Sure it is! A guardian angel has to be able to do its job properly, right?
sheardelight: (i ate you up the day we first spoke)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] sheardelight 2014-11-21 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
A plague of, uh.....friendship?
inviseyeble: ([neutral] banana)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] inviseyeble 2014-11-21 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think smiting is how guarding usually works.
sheardelight: ❚ commissioned ➻ credit if taken (approaching guiding light)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] sheardelight 2014-11-21 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
[W/E YOU'RE ALL NERDS]

At least it wouldn't be on purpose! Hm....what would you suggest instead?
sheardelight: (just walk by my side)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] sheardelight 2014-11-21 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
A searing declaration of love? I could probably do that.
inviseyeble: shooped @ dw ([looking off] pina colada)

Re: DISCUSS

[personal profile] inviseyeble 2014-11-21 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Right, so now it's our turn. That's what I'm saying.

Why is it stupid? We have to name and create one either way.

Page 1 of 5