dramatispersonae | [*] Carnelian

[*] Carnelian

[ Your team is left alone - strange, how it didn't seem like you went anywhere, just everyone else disappeared.

A woman's voice - can be heard now ]

Ah . . . what I would give . . . no, what you will give? Your choices will determine that, so let us play a simple card game. But first, choose your stance.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Why not use them all on the same team?

I'm concerned about the possibility of them reflecting. If they nullify it, we lose the game, but if they reflect we take that damage onto ourselves instead.

But it's true that if it works, we'd likely win.

Edited 2013-01-01 00:32 (UTC)

Right, so we should try to pick a team that hasn't chosen advisor if we use that strategy. Martyr should be fine as well, though.

I doubt we have many martyrs around. It's much more likely most teams picked advisor and attacker. Many teams don't like the idea of hurting others, but they wouldn't want to harm their entire team either unless absolutely necessary-- and the position of advisor gives them the chance to not hurt anyone.

That's why aiming for an attacker is much safer. Given who's playing I'm fairly certain that was Jasper's choice, but I'd rather not harm them. So we need to pick another team we're sure would go for it.

We can't be sure with any of them. Advisor would be hardest to win with, so that should give us some advantage. And I don't know the teams well enough to say who would definitely choose attacker. What about Heliodor or Peridot?

I'm almost entirely certain Peridot won't pick attacker. When I played with them, they were reluctant to cause any damage to people at all.

But Heliodor is a definite possibility-- especially since last game they were the ones who sent us the spear that hit me.

They're an easy target, and nobody has any strange attachments to their team. Should we risk it?

[ thinking thinking thinking

if this reflects their attacks they are pretty much dead, not just injured

but hey, they're not going to get anything without risking. ]

I'm fine with it.

But just in case, we should pick a proper order and two other teams as well. We're not certain they'll take all of these on one team.

My suggestion is to use the major attack on Heliodor as last, anyway.

Major attack on Heliodor second. If you think Jasper is likely to be an attacking team and you'd be willing, they could get the minor attack first. That would leave the medium attack third.

Mm...

Fine. Minor on Jasper first, high on Heliodor second, and medium on Iolite last. If we can play all on Heliodor, then the order is still the same.

Edited 2013-01-01 00:58 (UTC)

Unless you've got another suggestion for the first team to attack.

If it's minor damage it's no problem. And I have no doubt she'd pick attacker.

Then we're decided.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[*] Carnelian

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion

Re: discussion