boxupallthebutterflies: (all the shadows that I walk in)
Beatrice (and so on) ([personal profile] boxupallthebutterflies) wrote in [personal profile] dramatispersonae 2012-08-05 12:17 am (UTC)

Re: second case

Sadistic? ...In any case, it doesn't make much sense. If Jill has a method for which she can test for poison without drinking it, why is there a taste tester? If Jack is going to drink it regardless, then why test for it?

Let's put it this way. If Jack drank from the pail, then he was only doing his job. Perhaps he noticed it was poisoned, which is why they did not bring the pail back. What follows is an unrelated sequence of events.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting