؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2012-08-01 12:11 pm

Carnelian

[The sound of a breeze covers any conversation coming from other pavilions, though there's no wind here. The only furnishing is a table laid out with a tea service glazed in your team colors and a few leaves of paper.]
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2348470)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Two truths and a lie about the team...? Well, that sounds easy enough.
headcannon: (then I won't let you in)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] headcannon 2012-08-01 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Simple enough, then.
virtuallyroyalty: (Good Is Not Dumb)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-08-01 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Pretty straight-forward, yeah.
gemuine: cardinalsins@lj (pic#4030514)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] gemuine 2012-08-01 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
. . . is it.
headcannon: (you know what i mean)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] headcannon 2012-08-01 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Is it to be the team entire, or for individual members?
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2216411)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
As long as we pick two easily identifiable truths about Carnelian, and a difficult lie to spot.
gemuine: cardinalsins@lj (pic#4030672)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] gemuine 2012-08-01 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
. . .

Isn't it better if one of the truths seems like a lie. . .?
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2348470)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd say it has to be for the entire team. It'd make much more sense for each of us to submit those individually otherwise, no? Beside, it's easier to spot an entire team than an individual.
Edited 2012-08-01 23:32 (UTC)
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2216097)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Or if the lie is close enough to the truth, yes.
virtuallyroyalty: (you can be the rook or the pawn)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-08-01 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
We have to come up with it all as a team, yeah?
gemuine: cardinalsins@lj (pic#4030707)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] gemuine 2012-08-01 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Easy to understand but picking the right thing is going to be difficult.
fighting_alena: (inscrutable)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] fighting_alena 2012-08-01 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, another secrets game.

We're going to run out of secrets.
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2383755)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Hahahah...! Well, you do have a point. Any idea so far?
headcannon: (candle light and soul forever)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] headcannon 2012-08-01 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Mm, so it is. And it is a good opportunity to announce traits you wish emphasized to the other teams, as well.
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2216411)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not really going to care much for that, but I do want to pick things that are likely to give us a victory.

We need at least one easy truth to spot. Since you knights are outsider, I guess asking you is fair. What would be the first trait to come up to mind for you if you were to describe Carnelian?
gemuine: cardinalsins@lj (pic#4030515)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] gemuine 2012-08-01 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Is this supposed to be about Carnelian as a whole? Or can it be about individuals do you think . . . the second would be a lot easier.
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2287310)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, it doesn't necessarily have to be secrets.
virtuallyroyalty: (Curiosity Killed the Cast)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-08-01 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I have no clue since I don't actually know you guys at all, except for that one guy who's a jerk... oh, and you guys have a teammate dating Dragonfly on Coral.

... sorry!
Edited 2012-08-01 23:41 (UTC)
thankyouverymooch: (pic#2216015)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] thankyouverymooch 2012-08-01 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
It's true the second would be easier for us, but on the other hand, think about it. If we're supposed to pick these, then it means other teams will have to guess what the truths and what the lies are, no?

Not everyone is going to know an individual in a team, but almost everyone will know the team's reputation.
headcannon: (cruisin' the streets—oh yeah)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] headcannon 2012-08-01 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
So it appears. I'm afraid I don't know much about Carnelian.
headcannon: (then come on oh come on)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] headcannon 2012-08-01 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
...To my discredit, I am not sure I've spoken to anyone on your team at all before now. It appears we're of little help.
virtuallyroyalty: (the three trials)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] virtuallyroyalty 2012-08-01 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
If anything we can say what does sound believable or not, yeah.

Page 1 of 5