؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2011-03-06 08:23 pm

ROUND 2 - KUNZITE

[ The room is different this time -- larger. In the middle is a table with enough chairs for everyone. A platter of cheese and fruit sits there as well. You can hear Three's voice, but not see her. ]

Rank the remaining nine teams in terms of value. You may place your own team as high or low as you wish.

[ Also on the table is a colored tile for every team but Ruby and a small rectangular container with slots numbered one through nine. ]
labelledamesansmerci: (world domination? sounds good)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
So if we have conflict on which teams we should wish to put first ... we could have multiple votes for the top slots, to be safest.
gonnariverdance: (His rig of steel)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah . . . Maybe even split the top evenly with the bottom to average everything out.
labelledamesansmerci: (a breeze off to the side)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
Between the six of us, there are seven different teams we prioritize. I ... [hesitating, like it pains her to say] I would say we should pick those teams for whom more than one person voted for, for the top slots, as well.
gonnariverdance: (Well if y'ask me . . .)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
We could do it that way, or . . . [explains this again]
labelledamesansmerci: (a breeze off to the side)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, that could work out ... I suppose we'd just have to decide which half to put where, then.
gonnariverdance: (pic#744213)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
It wouldn't matter in the end doin' it that way. Everyone'd have the same value, see?

[laying out an example!]
labelledamesansmerci: (world domination? sounds good)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
[looking it over, then nodding] It all balances out in the end.
gonnariverdance: (pic#744215)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Does it meet with your approval?
labelledamesansmerci: (world domination? sounds good)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
[nods slowly] It puts us on even footing--even if they don't accept it, it sends a message.
gonnariverdance: (That's a beautiful penis)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
Seems like we're about settled then.
labelledamesansmerci: (a breeze off to the side)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
[DEEP BREATH] It appears so.