؟ ([personal profile] dramatispersonae) wrote2011-03-06 08:23 pm

ROUND 2 - KUNZITE

[ The room is different this time -- larger. In the middle is a table with enough chairs for everyone. A platter of cheese and fruit sits there as well. You can hear Three's voice, but not see her. ]

Rank the remaining nine teams in terms of value. You may place your own team as high or low as you wish.

[ Also on the table is a colored tile for every team but Ruby and a small rectangular container with slots numbered one through nine. ]
gonnariverdance: (What?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
. . . We could try breakin' the tiles to put a bit of each in every space. Stackin' them probably won't work.
labelledamesansmerci: (a breeze off to the side)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
... no, I doubt--we could try?
gonnariverdance: (pic#744178)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
[picks up the Kunzite tile to test—KER-SNAP]

. . . Looks like that's an option after all.
labelledamesansmerci: (I never knew such things)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
[nods :o]

Then--how many times, do you think, could we break a single tile?
gonnariverdance: (That's a beautiful penis)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe four times . . . Half and then half again.
heteronormative: (here we are now in containers)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] heteronormative 2011-03-07 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
Sounds good to me. Though then we still gotta figure out where we distribute 'em all. Hella too much for me, I'll sit that part out.
myroyalname: (I'm too busy for lost causes.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] myroyalname 2011-03-07 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
I'll do it, based on the answers given earlier...
heteronormative: (pic#744242)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] heteronormative 2011-03-07 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Right, addin' 'em up.
labelledamesansmerci: (world domination? sounds good)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
So if we have conflict on which teams we should wish to put first ... we could have multiple votes for the top slots, to be safest.
gonnariverdance: (His rig of steel)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah . . . Maybe even split the top evenly with the bottom to average everything out.
labelledamesansmerci: (a breeze off to the side)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
Between the six of us, there are seven different teams we prioritize. I ... [hesitating, like it pains her to say] I would say we should pick those teams for whom more than one person voted for, for the top slots, as well.
gonnariverdance: (Well if y'ask me . . .)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
We could do it that way, or . . . [explains this again]
labelledamesansmerci: (a breeze off to the side)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, that could work out ... I suppose we'd just have to decide which half to put where, then.
gonnariverdance: (pic#744213)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
It wouldn't matter in the end doin' it that way. Everyone'd have the same value, see?

[laying out an example!]
labelledamesansmerci: (world domination? sounds good)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
[looking it over, then nodding] It all balances out in the end.
gonnariverdance: (pic#744215)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Does it meet with your approval?
labelledamesansmerci: (world domination? sounds good)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci 2011-03-07 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
[nods slowly] It puts us on even footing--even if they don't accept it, it sends a message.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance - 2011-03-07 02:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] labelledamesansmerci - 2011-03-07 02:58 (UTC) - Expand
odetojoy: (can be serious)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] odetojoy 2011-03-07 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
You want to put the same value in each team, then?
gonnariverdance: (pic#744223)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
It's better than decidin' who to hurt the most.
odetojoy: (what a petty thing to say)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] odetojoy 2011-03-07 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
Or perhaps it will be worse for us.

Are we placing ourselves at the top?
gonnariverdance: (That's a beautiful penis)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
I was thinkin' we'd average everyone out evenly.
myroyalname: (Oh my!)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] myroyalname 2011-03-07 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
[after you've broken the tile]

Do you think they'll accept it?
gonnariverdance: (pic#744178)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
They might.
bromantical: (YAY TITS)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] bromantical 2011-03-07 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
[...................breaking tiles]

Will this really work?
gonnariverdance: (What?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] gonnariverdance 2011-03-07 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
It'd be shameful not to try it now.