Skip to Main Content
؟ (
dramatispersonae
) wrote
2011
-
03
-
06
07:57 pm
Entry tags:
!days 001-030
,
-ruby
,
¡game 017
,
•3 of 3
ROUND 2 - RUBY
I'm afraid you won't be playing this round. Well. Unless you want to take another team's place. It's your decision, after all.
Threaded
|
Top-Level Comments Only
DISCUSSION
dramatispersonae
2011-03-07 01:26 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FINAL ANSWER
dramatispersonae
2011-03-07 01:26 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Re: DISCUSSION
unfortunateson
2011-03-07 01:45 am (UTC)
(
link
)
[ . . . blink blink]
Re: DISCUSSION
heliokleptic
2011-03-07 01:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
...
Uh. No thanks.
[wishes he had something to stop the bleeding with.]
no subject
impersonate
2011-03-07 01:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
[wings over her bill]
Re: DISCUSSION
righthandsmoke
2011-03-07 01:46 am (UTC)
(
link
)
. . . What?
Re: DISCUSSION
adharma
2011-03-07 01:47 am (UTC)
(
link
)
. . . what did you guys do?
Re: DISCUSSION
unfortunateson
2011-03-07 01:47 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Then this--is good? However, if we don't play, are we--unable to win?
Re: DISCUSSION
fairlyheroic
2011-03-07 01:47 am (UTC)
(
link
)
. . . and why's that?
Re: DISCUSSION
unfortunateson
2011-03-07 01:49 am (UTC)
(
link
)
What do we do?
Re: DISCUSSION
righthandsmoke
2011-03-07 01:49 am (UTC)
(
link
)
We broke a tie to try and stop that psychopath from doing it.
Re: DISCUSSION
adharma
2011-03-07 01:51 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Oh, is that all.
Re: DISCUSSION
dramatispersonae
2011-03-07 01:51 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I've asked them to rank the teams, I think Ruby would be obviously last after this little decision, hm?
Re: DISCUSSION
righthandsmoke
2011-03-07 01:52 am (UTC)
(
link
)
. . . Does that mean you're counting us last already?
Re: DISCUSSION
righthandsmoke
2011-03-07 01:53 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I don't know . . .
[asking the persona stuff]
Re: DISCUSSION
fairlyheroic
2011-03-07 01:53 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Only because you called them out like that. Was that really necessary?
Re: DISCUSSION
unfortunateson
2011-03-07 01:53 am (UTC)
(
link
)
If we choose to take a team's place, what happens?
Re: DISCUSSION
righthandsmoke
2011-03-07 01:53 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Everyone got fucking pissed over two defense points.
Re: DISCUSSION
impersonate
2011-03-07 01:53 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Quack quack quack quaquack!
[but they said they understood!]
Re: DISCUSSION
adharma
2011-03-07 01:54 am (UTC)
(
link
)
That's how people are.
Re: DISCUSSION
dramatispersonae
2011-03-07 01:54 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Hm? No, not at all. After all, you can choose to move yourself around this way.
Re: DISCUSSION
dramatispersonae
2011-03-07 01:54 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Yes, I thought it was.
Re: DISCUSSION
dramatispersonae
2011-03-07 01:55 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Then you'll accept the fate of whatever the other teams have given them.
Re: DISCUSSION
dramatispersonae
2011-03-07 01:55 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Well, I can't say that I know what they would do truthfully, but it seems likely, hm?
Re: DISCUSSION
unfortunateson
2011-03-07 01:56 am (UTC)
(
link
)
If we can't win in this position--we ought to play.
165 comments
Post a new comment
Threaded
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Page 1 of 7
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
»
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Page 1 of 7